paper/gemini_partner_redpen_audit_v3_19_0.md: focused audit evaluating
whether the partner's hand-marked red-pen review of v3.17 (4 themes,
11 specific items) has been adequately addressed in the current
v3.19.0 draft. Cleaned from raw output (CLI 429 retry noise stripped).
Result: 8/11 RESOLVED, 3/11 N/A (the underlying text/analysis was
entirely removed in v3.18+: accountant-level BD/McCrary, the 139/32
C1/C2 split, and ZH/EN dual-language scaffolding). 0 remain
UNRESOLVED, PARTIAL, or merely IMPROVED.
Themes:
- Theme 1 (citation reality): RESOLVED via reference_verification_v3.md
and the [5] Hadjadj -> Kao & Wen correction in v3.18.
- Theme 2 (AI-sounding prose): RESOLVED at every flagged spot — A1
stipulation rewritten as cross-year pair-existence with three concrete
not-guaranteed conditions; conservative structural-similarity reduced
to one literal sentence; IV-G validation lead-in now explicitly
motivates each subsection.
- Theme 3 (ZH/EN alignment): N/A — v3.19.0 is monolingual English for
IEEE submission; the dual-language scaffolding that produced the gap
no longer exists.
- Theme 4 (specific numbers): all addressed — 92.6% match rate is now
purely descriptive; 0.95 cut-off explicitly anchored on Firm A P7.5;
Hartigan dip test correctly described as "more than one peak"; BIC
forced-fit framing made blunt; 139/32 + accountant-level BD/McCrary
removed.
Gemini's bottom line: "smallest residual set of polish required before
the partner re-read is empty." Manuscript is ready to send back to
partner.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
gbanyan
dbe2f676bf