# Roadmap — Paper A v4.0 Big-4 reframe Milestone goal: Ship Paper A v4.0 to IEEE Access with Big-4-only primary scope, dip-test confirmed bimodality, and full-dataset robustness as secondary. Branch: `paper-a-v4-big4` (from `from-outside-of-firmA` from `yolo-signature-pipeline` at v3.20.0). ## Phase 1 — Foundation: Big-4 subset script reruns **Status**: pending **Requirements covered**: REQ-001 **Tasks**: - Add `--scope=big4|full` flag to scripts 19, 20, 21, 24, 25 (and harness any others that load accountant aggregates) - Rerun on Big-4 subset; outputs to `reports/v4_big4/` - Bootstrap 95% CI on K=2 marginal crossings (extend Script 34's bootstrap to other measures) - Confirm dip-test p < 0.05 on Big-4 cos_mean and dh_mean (Script 34 already verified at p<0.0001 — replicate inside the rerun harness for audit trail) **Done when**: All five scripts produce v4_big4 outputs with bootstrap CI; cross-check against Script 34 numbers. ## Phase 2 — Methodology rewrite (§III-G / I / J / L) **Status**: pending; depends on Phase 1 **Requirements covered**: REQ-003 **Tasks**: - §III-G: re-justify accountant-level Big-4 as the analysis unit (sample size, dip-test evidence, contrast with mid/small heterogeneity) - §III-I: re-anchor "natural threshold" claim on dip-test multimodality + bootstrap stability - §III-J: K=2 primary (replicated 31% / hand-leaning 69%) + K=3 secondary (BIC -1111.93 vs -1108.45) - §III-L: derive cos>0.975 AND dh≤3.76 (or K=2 posterior cut) from §III-J components **Done when**: §III markdown files updated; cross-references to Phase 1 outputs are correct. ## Phase 3 — Results regeneration (§IV Tables IV-XVIII + §IV-K) **Status**: pending; depends on Phase 1 and 2 **Requirements covered**: REQ-001 (tables), REQ-002 (§IV-K), REQ-004 **Tasks**: - Regenerate Tables IV through XVIII on Big-4 subset (relabel as v4 numbering if order shifts) - Regenerate Figures 1-3 (Fig 4 yearly per-firm likely reusable) - New §IV-K Full-Dataset Robustness section: comparison table (Big-4 vs full), mid/small-firm contribution, why scope matters - Add firm × cluster cross-tab table from Script 35 **Done when**: All §IV tables and figures land in repo; cross-refs from §III hold. ## Phase 4 — Prose rewrite (Abstract / I / II / V / VI) **Status**: pending; depends on Phase 3 **Requirements covered**: REQ-005 **Tasks**: - Abstract: new threshold, new scope, retain the "reproducible pipeline" frame - §I Introduction: contributions list updated (Firm A reframe, Big-4 internal contrast finding, dip-test natural threshold) - §II Related Work: minimal changes (statistical methodology citations stable) - §V Discussion: Firm A as templated case study, PwC as hand-sign-leading firm, what this implies - §VI Conclusion + Future Work: forecast Paper B (audit behaviour / policy) **Done when**: All prose markdown files updated; word counts within IEEE Access limits (Abstract ≤ 250 words). ## Phase 5 — AI peer review (3 rounds across codex, Gemini, Opus) **Status**: pending; depends on Phase 4 (manuscript-complete state) **Requirements covered**: REQ-006 **Tasks**: - Round 1: codex (GPT-5.x) — full manuscript review with provenance verification - Round 1: Gemini 3.x Pro — full manuscript review - Round 1: Opus 4.7 max-effort — full manuscript review - Round 2: address Major findings; same three reviewers cross-check - Round 3: convergence — Accept / Minor from at least 2 of 3 reviewers **Done when**: Final round produces Accept/Minor consensus from majority; reviewer artifacts saved under `paper/`. ## Phase 6 — Partner Jimmy v4.0 review **Status**: pending; depends on Phase 5 **Requirements covered**: REQ-007 **Tasks**: - Export v4.0 DOCX (`paper/export_v3.py` + author block fill) - Ship to ~/Downloads - Iterate on Jimmy's comments - Capture review artifact in `paper/partner_jimmy_v4_review.md` **Done when**: Jimmy approves v4.0. ## Phase 7 — iThenticate + eCF + IEEE Access submission **Status**: pending; depends on Phase 6 **Requirements covered**: REQ-008 **Tasks**: - Run iThenticate, target similarity < 20% - Complete IEEE eCF - Upload manuscript + cover letter via IEEE Access submission portal - Capture confirmation number **Done when**: Submission confirmed by IEEE Access portal. --- *Phase ordering: 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 → 6 → 7 (mostly linear; Phase 5 round-2 may loop back to Phase 4 prose if Major findings).*