From d0bf2fe911013dfc4808fcbb211e184dd4313962 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gbanyan Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 15:24:03 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update STATE.md: Phase 1 complete, Phase 2 awaiting user review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Phase 1 (Foundation) all 7 spike + foundation scripts committed. Phase 2 (Methodology rewrite) §III-G..L draft delivered; 5 open questions flagged for user decision before Phase 3. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) --- .planning/STATE.md | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/.planning/STATE.md b/.planning/STATE.md index 70da4b1..d256cf3 100644 --- a/.planning/STATE.md +++ b/.planning/STATE.md @@ -2,23 +2,35 @@ **Date**: 2026-05-12 **Active milestone**: Paper A v4.0 — Big-4 reframe -**Active branch**: `paper-a-v4-big4` (3 commits ahead of `yolo-signature-pipeline`) -**Active phase**: Phase 1 — Foundation: Big-4 subset script reruns (not yet started) +**Active branch**: `paper-a-v4-big4` (12 commits ahead of `yolo-signature-pipeline`) +**Active phase**: Phase 2 — Methodology rewrite, draft delivered, **awaiting user review of 5 open questions in `paper/v4/paper_a_methodology_v4_section_iii.md`** before Phase 3 begins -## Recently completed (preceding this milestone) +## Recently completed -- Paper A v3.20.0 shipped to partner Jimmy 2026-04-27, DOCX `~/Downloads/Paper_A_IEEE_Access_Draft_v3.20.0_20260505.docx` -- Spike Scripts 32-35 (commits `e1d81e3` `8ac0988` `55f9f94`) confirming Big-4-only scope is methodologically superior: - - Script 32: non-Firm-A calibration verdict C (negative, but with the bifurcation twist) - - Script 33: reverse-anchor PAPER_C_STRONG (rho=+0.744 directional / -0.927 bifurcation) - - Script 34: Big-4-only K=2 with dip-test multimodal p<0.0001, bootstrap CI [0.974, 0.977] / [3.48, 3.97] - - Script 35: firm × cluster cross-tab — Firm A 0% C1 / 82.5% C3, PwC 23.5% C1 +**Phase 1 (Foundation, 7 spike + foundation scripts)**: +- Script 32 (`e1d81e3`): non-Firm-A calibration verdict C +- Script 33 (`8ac0988`): reverse-anchor PAPER_C_STRONG (directional ρ=+0.744) +- Script 34 (`55f9f94`): Big-4 K=2 dip-test multimodal p<0.0001, bootstrap CI [0.974, 0.977] / [3.48, 3.97] +- Script 35 (`55f9f94`): firm × cluster — Firm A 0% C1 / 82.5% C3, PwC 23.5% C1 +- Script 36 (`ccd9f23`): K=2 LOOO **UNSTABLE** (firm-mass conflation; max Δcos=0.028) +- Script 37 (`92f1db8`): K=3 LOOO **PARTIAL** (component shape stable, membership ±5-13pp) +- Script 38 (`bc36dcc`): convergence **STRONG** — 3 lenses pairwise ρ ≥ 0.879 +- Script 39 (`39575ce`): per-signature convergence **MODERATE** — κ=0.87 between per-CPA and per-sig K=3 fits +- Script 40 (`338737d`): pixel-identity FAR = **0%** on n=262 ground-truth replicated -## Pending — Phase 1 entry +**Phase 2 (Methodology rewrite)**: §III-G..L draft delivered at `paper/v4/paper_a_methodology_v4_section_iii.md` (commit on the same branch). Single coherent rewrite covering 6 sub-sections (G/H/I/J/K/L); cross-references to all 9 spike scripts; 5 open questions flagged at end of draft for user decision. -- [ ] Refactor scripts 19, 20, 21, 24, 25 to accept `--scope=big4|full` flag -- [ ] Define `reports/v4_big4/` output convention -- [ ] Decide whether to retire Script 32-35 spikes or keep as historical artifacts (recommend: keep, treated as "v4.0 origin evidence") +## Pending — Phase 2 user review (BEFORE Phase 3) + +5 decisions needed from user before Phase 3 (Results regeneration) starts: + +1. §III-G scope justification — three-point argument enough, or add a fourth? +2. §III-H Firm A phrasing — "case study of templated end" vs an alternative framing? +3. §III-J K=3 vs K=2 selection — lean on LOOO (current draft) or strengthen BIC argument? +4. §III-L hybrid classifier — keep inherited 5-way box rule, or commit to K=3 hard label as primary? +5. Section IV table numbering scheme — confirm before Phase 3 builds tables. + +Plus: any prose-level edits the user wants on the §III draft. ## Blockers