gbanyan/pdf_signature_extraction
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Phase 6 round-5 codex-review fixes: minor + nit cleanup

Browse Source 
Codex round-4 verification (commit bbb662a) disposition: Minor revision.
All prior blockers and majors confirmed resolved. Three small items remained.

MINOR (1 of 2 addressed in markdown source):
- Appendix rendered AFTER References (combined L1132 vs L1227), but IEEE
  convention places appendices BEFORE references. Swapped concatenation
  order in combined-file regeneration: abstract -> intro -> related_work
  -> methodology -> results -> discussion -> conclusion -> APPENDIX ->
  REFERENCES -> declarations -> impact. Combined file now has Appendix A
  at L1132 and References at L1194.

MINOR (deferred to typesetting):
- Table A.II is prose-heavy for IEEE double-column layout. This is a
  table-formatting concern for the LaTeX/DOCX export step (table*, smaller
  font, or column-break adjustments), not a markdown-source issue.
  Documenting as a known typesetting consideration for the export pipeline.

NIT:
- Table A.II referenced "§IV-M.4 footnote" but the content at §IV-M.4
  L1007 is inline prose, not a footnote. Changed to "(§IV-M.4)".

Artefacts:
- Combined manuscript regenerated: paper_a_v4_combined.md, 1316 lines.
- Appendix A.1 (BD/McCrary) + A.2 (Diagnostic Summary) precede References.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
gbanyan
2026-05-15 20:05:24 +08:00
parent bbb662acd1
commit 4efbb7f4b8
2 changed files with 63 additions and 63 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
paper/paper_a_appendix_v3.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Section III-M positions the unsupervised-diagnostic strategy as a set of complem
| Pool-normalised per-signature ICCR (§III-L.2; Script 43) | Deployed-rule specificity proxy at per-signature unit, accounting for pool size | Same as above + that pool replacement preserves the negative-anchor property |
| Document-level ICCR (§III-L.3; Script 45) | Operational alarm rate proxy at per-document unit under three alarm definitions | Same as above |
| Firm-heterogeneity logistic regression (§III-L.4; Script 44) | Multiplicative effect of firm membership on per-signature rate, controlling for pool size | Per-signature observations are clustered by CPA/firm; naïve standard errors unreliable; cluster-robust analysis is a future check |
| Cross-firm hit matrix (§III-L.4; Script 44) | Concentration of inter-CPA collisions within source firm | Concentration depends on deployed-rule semantics (the stricter same-pair joint event yields $97.0$–$99.96\%$ within-firm at all four firms versus $76.7$–$98.8\%$ under any-pair; §III-L.4); per-document per-firm assignment uses Script 45's mode-of-firms tie-break (§IV-M.4 footnote) |
| Cross-firm hit matrix (§III-L.4; Script 44) | Concentration of inter-CPA collisions within source firm | Concentration depends on deployed-rule semantics (the stricter same-pair joint event yields $97.0$–$99.96\%$ within-firm at all four firms versus $76.7$–$98.8\%$ under any-pair; §III-L.4); per-document per-firm assignment uses Script 45's mode-of-firms tie-break (§IV-M.4) |
| Alert-rate sensitivity sweep (§III-L.5; Script 46) | Local sensitivity of deployed rule to threshold perturbation | Gradient comparison is descriptive, not a formal plateau test |
| Convergent score Spearman ranking (§III-K.1; Script 38) | Internal-consistency of three feature-derived per-CPA scores | Scores share underlying inputs and are not statistically independent |
| Pixel-identical conservative positive capture (§III-K.4; Script 40) | Trivial sanity check on the conservative positive anchor | Anchor is tautologically captured by any reasonable threshold |