diff --git a/backend/app/config.py b/backend/app/config.py
index 825130e..9368211 100644
--- a/backend/app/config.py
+++ b/backend/app/config.py
@@ -3,10 +3,11 @@ from typing import Optional
 
 
 class Settings(BaseSettings):
-    ollama_base_url: str = "http://192.168.30.36:11434"
+    ollama_base_url: str = "http://localhost:11435"
     default_model: str = "qwen3:8b"
     openai_api_key: Optional[str] = None
     openai_base_url: Optional[str] = None
+    lens_api_token: Optional[str] = None
 
     class Config:
         env_file = ".env"
diff --git a/backend/app/routers/patent_search.py b/backend/app/routers/patent_search.py
index 2c1aff6..f296198 100644
--- a/backend/app/routers/patent_search.py
+++ b/backend/app/routers/patent_search.py
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-"""Patent Search Router - Search for similar patents"""
+"""Patent Search Router - Search for similar patents using Lens.org API"""
 
 import logging
 from typing import Optional, List
@@ -21,16 +21,20 @@ class PatentSearchRequest(BaseModel):
 
 
 class PatentResult(BaseModel):
-    """Single patent result"""
-    publication_number: str
+    """Single patent result from Lens.org"""
+    lens_id: str
+    doc_number: str
+    jurisdiction: str
+    kind: str
     title: str
-    snippet: str
-    publication_date: Optional[str] = None
-    assignee: Optional[str] = None
-    inventor: Optional[str] = None
-    status: str                         # ACTIVE, NOT_ACTIVE, UNKNOWN
-    pdf_url: Optional[str] = None
-    thumbnail_url: Optional[str] = None
+    abstract: Optional[str] = None
+    date_published: Optional[str] = None
+    applicants: List[str] = []
+    inventors: List[str] = []
+    legal_status: Optional[str] = None
+    classifications_cpc: List[str] = []
+    families_simple: List[str] = []
+    url: str
 
 
 class PatentSearchResponse(BaseModel):
@@ -68,7 +72,7 @@ async def search_patents(request: PatentSearchRequest):
     """
     Search for patents similar to the given description/query.
 
-    Uses Google Patents to find related patents based on keywords.
+    Uses Lens.org API to find related patents based on title, abstract, and claims.
     """
     logger.info(f"Patent search request: {request.query[:100]}...")
 
diff --git a/backend/app/services/patent_search_service.py b/backend/app/services/patent_search_service.py
index 645201d..52d3cdc 100644
--- a/backend/app/services/patent_search_service.py
+++ b/backend/app/services/patent_search_service.py
@@ -1,74 +1,48 @@
-"""Patent Search Service using Google Patents XHR API"""
+"""Patent Search Service using Lens.org API"""
 
 import httpx
 import logging
-from typing import List, Optional
-from urllib.parse import quote_plus
+from typing import List, Optional, Dict, Any
+from dataclasses import dataclass, asdict
+
+from app.config import settings
 
 logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
 
 
+@dataclass
 class PatentSearchResult:
-    """Single patent search result"""
-    def __init__(
-        self,
-        publication_number: str,
-        title: str,
-        snippet: str,
-        publication_date: Optional[str],
-        assignee: Optional[str],
-        inventor: Optional[str],
-        status: str,
-        pdf_url: Optional[str] = None,
-        thumbnail_url: Optional[str] = None,
-    ):
-        self.publication_number = publication_number
-        self.title = title
-        self.snippet = snippet
-        self.publication_date = publication_date
-        self.assignee = assignee
-        self.inventor = inventor
-        self.status = status
-        self.pdf_url = pdf_url
-        self.thumbnail_url = thumbnail_url
+    """Single patent search result from Lens.org"""
+    lens_id: str
+    doc_number: str
+    jurisdiction: str
+    kind: str
+    title: str
+    abstract: Optional[str]
+    date_published: Optional[str]
+    applicants: List[str]
+    inventors: List[str]
+    legal_status: Optional[str]
+    classifications_cpc: List[str]
+    families_simple: List[str]
+    url: str
 
-    def to_dict(self):
-        return {
-            "publication_number": self.publication_number,
-            "title": self.title,
-            "snippet": self.snippet,
-            "publication_date": self.publication_date,
-            "assignee": self.assignee,
-            "inventor": self.inventor,
-            "status": self.status,
-            "pdf_url": self.pdf_url,
-            "thumbnail_url": self.thumbnail_url,
-        }
+    def to_dict(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
+        return asdict(self)
 
 
 class PatentSearchService:
-    """Service for searching patents using Google Patents"""
+    """Service for searching patents using Lens.org API"""
 
-    GOOGLE_PATENTS_XHR_URL = "https://patents.google.com/xhr/query"
-    GOOGLE_PATENTS_PDF_BASE = "https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/"
+    LENS_API_URL = "https://api.lens.org/patent/search"
 
     def __init__(self):
         self._client: Optional[httpx.AsyncClient] = None
 
-    # Browser-like headers to avoid being blocked
-    DEFAULT_HEADERS = {
-        "User-Agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36",
-        "Accept": "application/json, text/plain, */*",
-        "Accept-Language": "en-US,en;q=0.9",
-        "Referer": "https://patents.google.com/",
-        "Origin": "https://patents.google.com",
-    }
-
     async def _get_client(self) -> httpx.AsyncClient:
         if self._client is None or self._client.is_closed:
             self._client = httpx.AsyncClient(
                 timeout=30.0,
-                headers=self.DEFAULT_HEADERS,
                 follow_redirects=True,
             )
         return self._client
@@ -77,16 +51,27 @@ class PatentSearchService:
         if self._client and not self._client.is_closed:
             await self._client.aclose()
 
+    def _get_headers(self) -> Dict[str, str]:
+        """Get headers with authorization token"""
+        token = settings.lens_api_token
+        if not token:
+            raise ValueError("LENS_API_TOKEN environment variable is not set")
+        return {
+            "Authorization": f"Bearer {token}",
+            "Content-Type": "application/json",
+            "Accept": "application/json",
+        }
+
     async def search(
         self,
         query: str,
         max_results: int = 10,
     ) -> dict:
         """
-        Search Google Patents for relevant patents
+        Search Lens.org for relevant patents
 
         Args:
-            query: Search query (can be a description or keywords)
+            query: Search query (searches title, abstract, and claims)
             max_results: Maximum number of results to return
 
         Returns:
@@ -95,16 +80,39 @@ class PatentSearchService:
         try:
             client = await self._get_client()
 
-            # URL encode the query
-            encoded_query = quote_plus(query)
-            url = f"{self.GOOGLE_PATENTS_XHR_URL}?url=q%3D{encoded_query}&exp=&tags="
+            # Build Lens.org query using query string format for full-text search
+            request_body = {
+                "query": query,
+                "size": max_results,
+                "sort": [{"_score": "desc"}]
+            }
 
-            logger.info(f"Searching patents with query: {query[:100]}...")
+            logger.info(f"Searching Lens.org patents with query: {query[:100]}...")
 
-            response = await client.get(url)
+            response = await client.post(
+                self.LENS_API_URL,
+                json=request_body,
+                headers=self._get_headers(),
+            )
+
+            if response.status_code == 401:
+                logger.error("Lens.org API authentication failed - check LENS_API_TOKEN")
+                return {
+                    "total_results": 0,
+                    "patents": [],
+                    "error": "Authentication failed - invalid API token"
+                }
+
+            if response.status_code == 429:
+                logger.warning("Lens.org API rate limit exceeded")
+                return {
+                    "total_results": 0,
+                    "patents": [],
+                    "error": "Rate limit exceeded - please try again later"
+                }
 
             if response.status_code != 200:
-                logger.error(f"Google Patents API returned status {response.status_code}")
+                logger.error(f"Lens.org API returned status {response.status_code}: {response.text}")
                 return {
                     "total_results": 0,
                     "patents": [],
@@ -112,56 +120,28 @@ class PatentSearchService:
                 }
 
             data = response.json()
-
-            # Parse results
-            results = data.get("results", {})
-            total_num = results.get("total_num_results", 0)
-            clusters = results.get("cluster", [])
+            total_results = data.get("total", 0)
+            results = data.get("data", [])
 
             patents: List[PatentSearchResult] = []
+            for item in results:
+                patent = self._parse_patent(item)
+                patents.append(patent)
 
-            if clusters and len(clusters) > 0:
-                patent_results = clusters[0].get("result", [])
-
-                for item in patent_results[:max_results]:
-                    patent_data = item.get("patent", {})
-                    family_meta = patent_data.get("family_metadata", {})
-                    aggregated = family_meta.get("aggregated", {})
-                    country_status = aggregated.get("country_status", [])
-
-                    status = "UNKNOWN"
-                    if country_status and len(country_status) > 0:
-                        best_stage = country_status[0].get("best_patent_stage", {})
-                        status = best_stage.get("state", "UNKNOWN")
-
-                    # Build PDF URL if available
-                    pdf_path = patent_data.get("pdf", "")
-                    pdf_url = f"{self.GOOGLE_PATENTS_PDF_BASE}{pdf_path}" if pdf_path else None
-
-                    # Build thumbnail URL
-                    thumbnail = patent_data.get("thumbnail", "")
-                    thumbnail_url = f"{self.GOOGLE_PATENTS_PDF_BASE}{thumbnail}" if thumbnail else None
-
-                    patent = PatentSearchResult(
-                        publication_number=patent_data.get("publication_number", ""),
-                        title=self._clean_html(patent_data.get("title", "")),
-                        snippet=self._clean_html(patent_data.get("snippet", "")),
-                        publication_date=patent_data.get("publication_date"),
-                        assignee=patent_data.get("assignee"),
-                        inventor=patent_data.get("inventor"),
-                        status=status,
-                        pdf_url=pdf_url,
-                        thumbnail_url=thumbnail_url,
-                    )
-                    patents.append(patent)
-
-            logger.info(f"Found {total_num} total patents, returning {len(patents)}")
+            logger.info(f"Found {total_results} total patents, returning {len(patents)}")
 
             return {
-                "total_results": total_num,
+                "total_results": total_results,
                 "patents": [p.to_dict() for p in patents],
             }
 
+        except ValueError as e:
+            logger.error(f"Configuration error: {e}")
+            return {
+                "total_results": 0,
+                "patents": [],
+                "error": str(e)
+            }
         except httpx.HTTPError as e:
             logger.error(f"HTTP error searching patents: {e}")
             return {
@@ -177,18 +157,107 @@ class PatentSearchService:
                 "error": str(e)
             }
 
-    def _clean_html(self, text: str) -> str:
-        """Remove HTML entities and tags from text"""
-        if not text:
+    def _parse_patent(self, item: Dict[str, Any]) -> PatentSearchResult:
+        """Parse a single patent result from Lens.org response"""
+        lens_id = item.get("lens_id", "")
+        jurisdiction = item.get("jurisdiction", "")
+        doc_number = item.get("doc_number", "")
+        kind = item.get("kind", "")
+
+        # Get biblio section (contains title, parties, classifications)
+        biblio = item.get("biblio", {})
+
+        # Extract title from biblio.invention_title (list with lang info)
+        title_data = biblio.get("invention_title", [])
+        title = self._extract_text_with_lang(title_data)
+
+        # Extract abstract (top-level, list with lang info)
+        abstract_data = item.get("abstract", [])
+        abstract = self._extract_text_with_lang(abstract_data)
+
+        # Extract applicants from biblio.parties.applicants
+        parties = biblio.get("parties", {})
+        applicants = []
+        applicant_data = parties.get("applicants", [])
+        if isinstance(applicant_data, list):
+            for app in applicant_data:
+                if isinstance(app, dict):
+                    name = app.get("extracted_name", {}).get("value", "")
+                    if name:
+                        applicants.append(name)
+
+        # Extract inventors from biblio.parties.inventors
+        inventors = []
+        inventor_data = parties.get("inventors", [])
+        if isinstance(inventor_data, list):
+            for inv in inventor_data:
+                if isinstance(inv, dict):
+                    name = inv.get("extracted_name", {}).get("value", "")
+                    if name:
+                        inventors.append(name)
+
+        # Extract legal status
+        legal_status_data = item.get("legal_status", {})
+        legal_status = None
+        if isinstance(legal_status_data, dict):
+            legal_status = legal_status_data.get("patent_status")
+
+        # Extract CPC classifications from biblio.classifications_cpc
+        classifications_cpc = []
+        cpc_data = biblio.get("classifications_cpc", [])
+        if isinstance(cpc_data, list):
+            for cpc in cpc_data:
+                if isinstance(cpc, dict):
+                    symbol = cpc.get("symbol", "")
+                    if symbol:
+                        classifications_cpc.append(symbol)
+
+        # Extract simple family members
+        families_simple = []
+        families_data = item.get("families", {})
+        if isinstance(families_data, dict):
+            simple_family = families_data.get("simple", {})
+            if isinstance(simple_family, dict):
+                members = simple_family.get("members", [])
+                if isinstance(members, list):
+                    families_simple = [m.get("lens_id", "") for m in members if isinstance(m, dict) and m.get("lens_id")]
+
+        # Build URL to Lens.org patent page
+        url = f"https://www.lens.org/lens/patent/{lens_id}" if lens_id else ""
+
+        return PatentSearchResult(
+            lens_id=lens_id,
+            doc_number=doc_number,
+            jurisdiction=jurisdiction,
+            kind=kind,
+            title=title,
+            abstract=abstract,
+            date_published=item.get("date_published"),
+            applicants=applicants,
+            inventors=inventors,
+            legal_status=legal_status,
+            classifications_cpc=classifications_cpc,
+            families_simple=families_simple,
+            url=url,
+        )
+
+    def _extract_text_with_lang(self, data: Any, prefer_lang: str = "en") -> str:
+        """Extract text from Lens.org language-tagged list, preferring specified language"""
+        if not data:
             return ""
-        # Replace common HTML entities
-        text = text.replace("…", "...")
-        text = text.replace("&", "&")
-        text = text.replace("&lt;", "<")
-        text = text.replace("&gt;", ">")
-        text = text.replace("&quot;", '"')
-        text = text.replace("&#39;", "'")
-        return text.strip()
+        if isinstance(data, str):
+            return data
+        if isinstance(data, list) and data:
+            # Prefer specified language
+            for item in data:
+                if isinstance(item, dict) and item.get("lang") == prefer_lang:
+                    return item.get("text", "")
+            # Fall back to first item
+            first = data[0]
+            if isinstance(first, dict):
+                return first.get("text", "")
+            return str(first)
+        return ""
 
 
 # Singleton instance
diff --git a/frontend/package-lock.json b/frontend/package-lock.json
index 95fb22c..fa722c0 100644
--- a/frontend/package-lock.json
+++ b/frontend/package-lock.json
@@ -155,7 +155,6 @@
       "integrity": "sha512-e7jT4DxYvIDLk1ZHmU/m/mB19rex9sv0c2ftBtjSBv+kVM/902eh0fINUzD7UwLLNR+jU585GxUJ8/EBfAM5fw==",
       "dev": true,
       "license": "MIT",
-      "peer": true,
       "dependencies": {
         "@babel/code-frame": "^7.27.1",
         "@babel/generator": "^7.28.5",
@@ -2446,7 +2445,6 @@
       "integrity": "sha512-GNWcUTRBgIRJD5zj+Tq0fKOJ5XZajIiBroOF0yvj2bSU1WvNdYS/dn9UxwsujGW4JX06dnHyjV2y9rRaybH0iQ==",
       "dev": true,
       "license": "MIT",
-      "peer": true,
       "dependencies": {
         "undici-types": "~7.16.0"
       }
@@ -2457,7 +2455,6 @@
       "integrity": "sha512-MWtvHrGZLFttgeEj28VXHxpmwYbor/ATPYbBfSFZEIRK0ecCFLl2Qo55z52Hss+UV9CRN7trSeq1zbgx7YDWWg==",
       "devOptional": true,
       "license": "MIT",
-      "peer": true,
       "dependencies": {
         "csstype": "^3.2.2"
       }
@@ -2518,7 +2515,6 @@
       "integrity": "sha512-jCzKdm/QK0Kg4V4IK/oMlRZlY+QOcdjv89U2NgKHZk1CYTj82/RVSx1mV/0gqCVMJ/DA+Zf/S4NBWNF8GQ+eqQ==",
       "dev": true,
       "license": "MIT",
-      "peer": true,
       "dependencies": {
         "@typescript-eslint/scope-manager": "8.48.0",
         "@typescript-eslint/types": "8.48.0",
@@ -2802,7 +2798,6 @@
       "integrity": "sha512-NZyJarBfL7nWwIq+FDL6Zp/yHEhePMNnnJ0y3qfieCrmNvYct8uvtiV41UvlSe6apAfk0fY1FbWx+NwfmpvtTg==",
       "dev": true,
       "license": "MIT",
-      "peer": true,
       "bin": {
         "acorn": "bin/acorn"
       },
@@ -2971,7 +2966,6 @@
         }
       ],
       "license": "MIT",
-      "peer": true,
       "dependencies": {
         "baseline-browser-mapping": "^2.8.25",
         "caniuse-lite": "^1.0.30001754",
@@ -3442,7 +3436,6 @@
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/d3-selection/-/d3-selection-3.0.0.tgz",
       "integrity": "sha512-fmTRWbNMmsmWq6xJV8D19U/gw/bwrHfNXxrIN+HfZgnzqTHp9jOmKMhsTUjXOJnZOdZY9Q28y4yebKzqDKlxlQ==",
       "license": "ISC",
-      "peer": true,
       "engines": {
         "node": ">=12"
       }
@@ -3531,8 +3524,7 @@
       "version": "1.11.19",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/dayjs/-/dayjs-1.11.19.tgz",
       "integrity": "sha512-t5EcLVS6QPBNqM2z8fakk/NKel+Xzshgt8FFKAn+qwlD1pzZWxh0nVCrvFK7ZDb6XucZeF9z8C7CBWTRIVApAw==",
-      "license": "MIT",
-      "peer": true
+      "license": "MIT"
     },
     "node_modules/debug": {
       "version": "4.4.3",
@@ -3646,7 +3638,6 @@
       "integrity": "sha512-BhHmn2yNOFA9H9JmmIVKJmd288g9hrVRDkdoIgRCRuSySRUHH7r/DI6aAXW9T1WwUuY3DFgrcaqB+deURBLR5g==",
       "dev": true,
       "license": "MIT",
-      "peer": true,
       "dependencies": {
         "@eslint-community/eslint-utils": "^4.8.0",
         "@eslint-community/regexpp": "^4.12.1",
@@ -4376,7 +4367,6 @@
       "integrity": "sha512-5gTmgEY/sqK6gFXLIsQNH19lWb4ebPDLA4SdLP7dsWkIXHWlG66oPuVvXSGFPppYZz8ZDZq0dYYrbHfBCVUb1Q==",
       "dev": true,
       "license": "MIT",
-      "peer": true,
       "engines": {
         "node": ">=12"
       },
@@ -4503,7 +4493,6 @@
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/react/-/react-19.2.0.tgz",
       "integrity": "sha512-tmbWg6W31tQLeB5cdIBOicJDJRR2KzXsV7uSK9iNfLWQ5bIZfxuPEHp7M8wiHyHnn0DD1i7w3Zmin0FtkrwoCQ==",
       "license": "MIT",
-      "peer": true,
       "engines": {
         "node": ">=0.10.0"
       }
@@ -4513,7 +4502,6 @@
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/react-dom/-/react-dom-19.2.0.tgz",
       "integrity": "sha512-UlbRu4cAiGaIewkPyiRGJk0imDN2T3JjieT6spoL2UeSf5od4n5LB/mQ4ejmxhCFT1tYe8IvaFulzynWovsEFQ==",
       "license": "MIT",
-      "peer": true,
       "dependencies": {
         "scheduler": "^0.27.0"
       },
@@ -4767,7 +4755,6 @@
       "integrity": "sha512-jl1vZzPDinLr9eUt3J/t7V6FgNEw9QjvBPdysz9KfQDD41fQrC2Y4vKQdiaUpFT4bXlb1RHhLpp8wtm6M5TgSw==",
       "dev": true,
       "license": "Apache-2.0",
-      "peer": true,
       "bin": {
         "tsc": "bin/tsc",
         "tsserver": "bin/tsserver"
@@ -4863,7 +4850,6 @@
       "integrity": "sha512-tI2l/nFHC5rLh7+5+o7QjKjSR04ivXDF4jcgV0f/bTQ+OJiITy5S6gaynVsEM+7RqzufMnVbIon6Sr5x1SDYaQ==",
       "dev": true,
       "license": "MIT",
-      "peer": true,
       "dependencies": {
         "esbuild": "^0.25.0",
         "fdir": "^6.5.0",
@@ -4985,7 +4971,6 @@
       "integrity": "sha512-AvvthqfqrAhNH9dnfmrfKzX5upOdjUVJYFqNSlkmGf64gRaTzlPwz99IHYnVs28qYAybvAlBV+H7pn0saFY4Ig==",
       "dev": true,
       "license": "MIT",
-      "peer": true,
       "funding": {
         "url": "https://github.com/sponsors/colinhacks"
       }
diff --git a/frontend/src/App.tsx b/frontend/src/App.tsx
index cddaadd..c869a5d 100644
--- a/frontend/src/App.tsx
+++ b/frontend/src/App.tsx
@@ -489,6 +489,37 @@ function App() {
                 availableModels={availableModels}
               />
             )}
+            {activeTab === 'patent' && (
+              <div style={{ padding: 16 }}>
+                <Typography.Title level={5} style={{ marginBottom: 16 }}>
+                  <FileSearchOutlined style={{ marginRight: 8 }} />
+                  Patent Search Info
+                </Typography.Title>
+                <Typography.Paragraph type="secondary" style={{ fontSize: 12 }}>
+                  Search patents using the Lens.org API to find prior art and similar inventions.
+                </Typography.Paragraph>
+                <Typography.Title level={5} style={{ marginTop: 24, marginBottom: 12 }}>
+                  How to Use
+                </Typography.Title>
+                <Typography.Paragraph style={{ fontSize: 12 }}>
+                  <ol style={{ paddingLeft: 16, margin: 0 }}>
+                    <li style={{ marginBottom: 8 }}>Click a generated description on the left to load it into the search box</li>
+                    <li style={{ marginBottom: 8 }}>Edit the description to refine your search query</li>
+                    <li style={{ marginBottom: 8 }}>Click "Search Patents" to find similar patents</li>
+                    <li style={{ marginBottom: 8 }}>Results appear on the right - click to view on Lens.org</li>
+                  </ol>
+                </Typography.Paragraph>
+                <Typography.Title level={5} style={{ marginTop: 24, marginBottom: 12 }}>
+                  Result Interpretation
+                </Typography.Title>
+                <Typography.Paragraph type="secondary" style={{ fontSize: 12 }}>
+                  <strong>Many results:</strong> Query may overlap with existing prior art - consider making it more specific.
+                </Typography.Paragraph>
+                <Typography.Paragraph type="secondary" style={{ fontSize: 12 }}>
+                  <strong>Few/no results:</strong> Potentially novel concept - good candidate for further exploration.
+                </Typography.Paragraph>
+              </div>
+            )}
             {activeTab === 'deduplication' && (
               <div style={{ padding: 16 }}>
                 <Typography.Title level={5} style={{ marginBottom: 16 }}>
diff --git a/frontend/src/components/PatentSearchPanel.tsx b/frontend/src/components/PatentSearchPanel.tsx
index 3ce1b64..b39a565 100644
--- a/frontend/src/components/PatentSearchPanel.tsx
+++ b/frontend/src/components/PatentSearchPanel.tsx
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-import { useState, useCallback } from 'react';
+import { useState, useCallback, useEffect } from 'react';
 import {
   Card,
   Button,
@@ -10,17 +10,24 @@ import {
   List,
   Tooltip,
   message,
+  Badge,
 } from 'antd';
 import {
   SearchOutlined,
   LinkOutlined,
   CopyOutlined,
   DeleteOutlined,
-  GlobalOutlined,
+  CheckCircleOutlined,
+  CloseCircleOutlined,
+  ClockCircleOutlined,
+  QuestionCircleOutlined,
+  EditOutlined,
 } from '@ant-design/icons';
 import type {
   ExpertTransformationDescription,
+  PatentResult,
 } from '../types';
+import { searchPatents } from '../services/api';
 
 const { Text, Paragraph } = Typography;
 const { TextArea } = Input;
@@ -30,315 +37,402 @@ interface PatentSearchPanelProps {
   isDark: boolean;
 }
 
-interface SearchItem {
+interface SearchResultItem {
   id: string;
   query: string;
-  searchUrl: string;
   expertName?: string;
   keyword?: string;
+  loading: boolean;
+  error?: string;
+  totalResults: number;
+  patents: PatentResult[];
 }
 
-// Generate Google Patents search URL
-function generatePatentSearchUrl(query: string): string {
-  // Extract key terms and create a search-friendly query
-  const encodedQuery = encodeURIComponent(query);
-  return `https://patents.google.com/?q=${encodedQuery}`;
-}
-
-// Generate Lens.org search URL (alternative)
-function generateLensSearchUrl(query: string): string {
-  const encodedQuery = encodeURIComponent(query);
-  return `https://www.lens.org/lens/search/patent/list?q=${encodedQuery}`;
+// Get status icon and color
+function getStatusDisplay(status: string | null): { icon: React.ReactNode; color: string; text: string } {
+  switch (status) {
+    case 'ACTIVE':
+      return { icon: <CheckCircleOutlined />, color: 'green', text: 'Active' };
+    case 'PENDING':
+      return { icon: <ClockCircleOutlined />, color: 'blue', text: 'Pending' };
+    case 'DISCONTINUED':
+    case 'EXPIRED':
+      return { icon: <CloseCircleOutlined />, color: 'red', text: status };
+    default:
+      return { icon: <QuestionCircleOutlined />, color: 'default', text: status || 'Unknown' };
+  }
 }
 
 export function PatentSearchPanel({ descriptions, isDark }: PatentSearchPanelProps) {
   const [customQuery, setCustomQuery] = useState('');
-  const [searchItems, setSearchItems] = useState<SearchItem[]>([]);
-  const [selectedDescriptions, setSelectedDescriptions] = useState<Set<number>>(new Set());
+  const [searchResults, setSearchResults] = useState<SearchResultItem[]>([]);
+  const [isSearching, setIsSearching] = useState(false);
+  const [apiStatus, setApiStatus] = useState<'checking' | 'connected' | 'error'>('checking');
 
-  // Add custom query to search list
-  const handleAddCustomQuery = useCallback(() => {
+  // Check API connection on mount
+  useEffect(() => {
+    const checkApi = async () => {
+      try {
+        const res = await fetch(`http://${window.location.hostname}:8001/health`);
+        setApiStatus(res.ok ? 'connected' : 'error');
+      } catch {
+        setApiStatus('error');
+      }
+    };
+    checkApi();
+  }, []);
+
+  // Search patents for a query
+  const doSearch = useCallback(async (
+    query: string,
+    expertName?: string,
+    keyword?: string
+  ): Promise<SearchResultItem> => {
+    const id = `search-${Date.now()}-${Math.random().toString(36).substr(2, 9)}`;
+
+    try {
+      const response = await searchPatents({ query, max_results: 10 });
+
+      return {
+        id,
+        query,
+        expertName,
+        keyword,
+        loading: false,
+        totalResults: response.total_results,
+        patents: response.patents,
+        error: response.error || undefined,
+      };
+    } catch (err) {
+      const errorMsg = err instanceof Error ? err.message : 'Search failed';
+
+      return {
+        id,
+        query,
+        expertName,
+        keyword,
+        loading: false,
+        totalResults: 0,
+        patents: [],
+        error: `${errorMsg} (API: ${window.location.hostname}:8001)`,
+      };
+    }
+  }, []);
+
+  // Handle custom query search
+  const handleSearchCustom = useCallback(async () => {
     if (!customQuery.trim()) return;
 
-    const newItem: SearchItem = {
-      id: `custom-${Date.now()}`,
-      query: customQuery.trim(),
-      searchUrl: generatePatentSearchUrl(customQuery.trim()),
-    };
-
-    setSearchItems(prev => [newItem, ...prev]);
+    setIsSearching(true);
+    const result = await doSearch(customQuery.trim());
+    setSearchResults(prev => [result, ...prev]);
     setCustomQuery('');
-    message.success('Added to search list');
-  }, [customQuery]);
+    setIsSearching(false);
 
-  // Add selected descriptions to search list
-  const handleAddSelected = useCallback(() => {
-    if (!descriptions || selectedDescriptions.size === 0) return;
+    if (result.error) {
+      message.error(`Search failed: ${result.error}`);
+    } else {
+      message.success(`Found ${result.totalResults.toLocaleString()} patents (${result.patents.length} returned)`);
+    }
+  }, [customQuery, doSearch]);
 
-    const newItems: SearchItem[] = Array.from(selectedDescriptions).map(idx => {
-      const desc = descriptions[idx];
-      return {
-        id: `desc-${idx}-${Date.now()}`,
-        query: desc.description,
-        searchUrl: generatePatentSearchUrl(desc.description),
-        expertName: desc.expert_name,
-        keyword: desc.keyword,
-      };
-    });
-
-    setSearchItems(prev => [...newItems, ...prev]);
-    setSelectedDescriptions(new Set());
-    message.success(`Added ${newItems.length} items to search list`);
-  }, [descriptions, selectedDescriptions]);
-
-  // Remove item from list
-  const handleRemoveItem = useCallback((id: string) => {
-    setSearchItems(prev => prev.filter(item => item.id !== id));
+  // Handle clicking a generated description - put it in search input
+  const handleSelectDescription = useCallback((desc: ExpertTransformationDescription) => {
+    setCustomQuery(desc.description);
+    message.info('Description loaded into search box - edit and search when ready');
   }, []);
 
-  // Copy URL to clipboard
-  const handleCopyUrl = useCallback((url: string) => {
-    navigator.clipboard.writeText(url);
-    message.success('URL copied to clipboard');
+  // Remove result from list
+  const handleRemoveResult = useCallback((id: string) => {
+    setSearchResults(prev => prev.filter(item => item.id !== id));
   }, []);
 
-  // Toggle description selection
-  const toggleDescription = useCallback((index: number) => {
-    setSelectedDescriptions(prev => {
-      const next = new Set(prev);
-      if (next.has(index)) {
-        next.delete(index);
-      } else {
-        next.add(index);
-      }
-      return next;
-    });
+  // Copy patent info to clipboard
+  const handleCopyPatent = useCallback((patent: PatentResult) => {
+    const text = `${patent.title}\n${patent.jurisdiction}-${patent.doc_number}\n${patent.url}`;
+    navigator.clipboard.writeText(text);
+    message.success('Patent info copied');
   }, []);
 
-  // Clear all
+  // Clear all results
   const handleClearAll = useCallback(() => {
-    setSearchItems([]);
+    setSearchResults([]);
   }, []);
 
-  const containerStyle: React.CSSProperties = {
-    height: '100%',
-    display: 'flex',
-    flexDirection: 'column',
-    gap: 16,
-    padding: 16,
-    overflow: 'auto',
-  };
-
   const cardStyle: React.CSSProperties = {
     background: isDark ? '#1f1f1f' : '#fff',
   };
 
   return (
-    <div style={containerStyle}>
-      {/* Info banner */}
-      <Card size="small" style={cardStyle}>
-        <Space>
-          <GlobalOutlined style={{ color: '#1890ff' }} />
-          <Text>
-            Generate search links to check for similar patents on Google Patents or Lens.org
-          </Text>
-        </Space>
-      </Card>
-
-      {/* Custom search input */}
-      <Card size="small" title="Add Custom Search" style={cardStyle}>
-        <TextArea
-          placeholder="Enter a description to search for similar patents..."
-          value={customQuery}
-          onChange={e => setCustomQuery(e.target.value)}
-          autoSize={{ minRows: 2, maxRows: 4 }}
-          style={{ marginBottom: 8 }}
-        />
-        <Button
-          type="primary"
-          icon={<SearchOutlined />}
-          onClick={handleAddCustomQuery}
-          disabled={!customQuery.trim()}
-        >
-          Add to Search List
-        </Button>
-      </Card>
-
-      {/* Description selection (if available) */}
-      {descriptions && descriptions.length > 0 && (
-        <Card
-          size="small"
-          title={`Generated Descriptions (${descriptions.length})`}
-          style={cardStyle}
-          extra={
-            <Button
-              type="primary"
+    <div style={{
+      height: 'calc(100vh - 180px)',
+      width: '100%',
+      padding: 16,
+      boxSizing: 'border-box',
+      display: 'flex',
+      flexDirection: 'row',
+      gap: 16,
+    }}>
+        {/* Left Column - Search Input & Generated Descriptions */}
+        <div style={{
+          flex: '0 0 40%',
+          minWidth: 0,
+          display: 'flex',
+          flexDirection: 'column',
+          gap: 12,
+          overflow: 'auto',
+        }}>
+            {/* Search input */}
+            <Card
               size="small"
-              icon={<SearchOutlined />}
-              onClick={handleAddSelected}
-              disabled={selectedDescriptions.size === 0}
+              title={
+                <Space>
+                  <span>Patent Search</span>
+                  {apiStatus === 'checking' && <Tag color="processing">Checking...</Tag>}
+                  {apiStatus === 'connected' && <Tag color="success">Connected</Tag>}
+                  {apiStatus === 'error' && (
+                    <Tooltip title={`Cannot reach ${window.location.hostname}:8001`}>
+                      <Tag color="error">Unreachable</Tag>
+                    </Tooltip>
+                  )}
+                </Space>
+              }
+              style={cardStyle}
             >
-              Add Selected ({selectedDescriptions.size})
-            </Button>
-          }
-        >
-          <div style={{ maxHeight: 200, overflow: 'auto' }}>
-            <Space direction="vertical" style={{ width: '100%' }}>
-              {descriptions.slice(0, 20).map((desc, idx) => (
-                <div
-                  key={idx}
-                  onClick={() => toggleDescription(idx)}
-                  style={{
-                    padding: 8,
-                    borderRadius: 4,
-                    cursor: 'pointer',
-                    background: selectedDescriptions.has(idx)
-                      ? (isDark ? '#177ddc22' : '#1890ff11')
-                      : (isDark ? '#141414' : '#fafafa'),
-                    border: selectedDescriptions.has(idx)
-                      ? `1px solid ${isDark ? '#177ddc' : '#1890ff'}`
-                      : `1px solid ${isDark ? '#303030' : '#f0f0f0'}`,
-                  }}
-                >
-                  <Space size={4}>
-                    <Tag color="blue" style={{ fontSize: 10 }}>{desc.expert_name}</Tag>
-                    <Tag style={{ fontSize: 10 }}>{desc.keyword}</Tag>
-                  </Space>
-                  <Paragraph
-                    ellipsis={{ rows: 2 }}
-                    style={{ marginBottom: 0, marginTop: 4, fontSize: 12 }}
-                  >
-                    {desc.description}
-                  </Paragraph>
-                </div>
-              ))}
-              {descriptions.length > 20 && (
-                <Text type="secondary">
-                  And {descriptions.length - 20} more descriptions...
-                </Text>
-              )}
-            </Space>
-          </div>
-        </Card>
-      )}
-
-      {/* Search list */}
-      {searchItems.length > 0 && (
-        <Card
-          size="small"
-          title={`Search List (${searchItems.length})`}
-          style={{ ...cardStyle, flex: 1, minHeight: 0, overflow: 'hidden', display: 'flex', flexDirection: 'column' }}
-          extra={
-            <Button size="small" danger onClick={handleClearAll}>
-              Clear All
-            </Button>
-          }
-          bodyStyle={{ flex: 1, overflow: 'auto', padding: 0 }}
-        >
-          <List
-            dataSource={searchItems}
-            renderItem={item => (
-              <List.Item
-                style={{
-                  padding: '12px 16px',
-                  borderBottom: `1px solid ${isDark ? '#303030' : '#f0f0f0'}`,
+              <TextArea
+                placeholder="Enter a description to search for similar patents... Click a generated description below to load it here for editing."
+                value={customQuery}
+                onChange={e => setCustomQuery(e.target.value)}
+                onPressEnter={e => {
+                  if (!e.shiftKey) {
+                    e.preventDefault();
+                    handleSearchCustom();
+                  }
                 }}
-                actions={[
-                  <Tooltip title="Open in Google Patents" key="google">
-                    <Button
-                      type="link"
-                      icon={<LinkOutlined />}
-                      href={item.searchUrl}
-                      target="_blank"
-                    >
-                      Google
-                    </Button>
-                  </Tooltip>,
-                  <Tooltip title="Open in Lens.org" key="lens">
-                    <Button
-                      type="link"
-                      icon={<GlobalOutlined />}
-                      href={generateLensSearchUrl(item.query)}
-                      target="_blank"
-                    >
-                      Lens
-                    </Button>
-                  </Tooltip>,
-                  <Tooltip title="Copy URL" key="copy">
-                    <Button
-                      type="text"
-                      icon={<CopyOutlined />}
-                      onClick={() => handleCopyUrl(item.searchUrl)}
-                    />
-                  </Tooltip>,
-                  <Tooltip title="Remove" key="remove">
-                    <Button
-                      type="text"
-                      danger
-                      icon={<DeleteOutlined />}
-                      onClick={() => handleRemoveItem(item.id)}
-                    />
-                  </Tooltip>,
-                ]}
+                autoSize={{ minRows: 3, maxRows: 6 }}
+                style={{ marginBottom: 8 }}
+                disabled={isSearching}
+              />
+              <Button
+                type="primary"
+                icon={<SearchOutlined />}
+                onClick={handleSearchCustom}
+                disabled={!customQuery.trim()}
+                loading={isSearching}
+                block
               >
-                <List.Item.Meta
-                  title={
-                    <Space size={4}>
-                      {item.expertName && (
-                        <Tag color="blue" style={{ fontSize: 10 }}>{item.expertName}</Tag>
-                      )}
-                      {item.keyword && (
-                        <Tag style={{ fontSize: 10 }}>{item.keyword}</Tag>
-                      )}
+                Search Patents
+              </Button>
+            </Card>
+
+            {/* Generated Descriptions */}
+            {descriptions && descriptions.length > 0 && (
+              <Card
+                size="small"
+                title={`Generated Descriptions (${descriptions.length})`}
+                style={{ ...cardStyle, flex: 1, overflow: 'hidden', display: 'flex', flexDirection: 'column' }}
+                bodyStyle={{ flex: 1, overflow: 'auto', padding: 8 }}
+              >
+                <Space direction="vertical" style={{ width: '100%' }} size={8}>
+                  {descriptions.map((desc, idx) => (
+                    <div
+                      key={idx}
+                      onClick={() => handleSelectDescription(desc)}
+                      style={{
+                        padding: 8,
+                        borderRadius: 4,
+                        cursor: 'pointer',
+                        background: isDark ? '#141414' : '#fafafa',
+                        border: `1px solid ${isDark ? '#303030' : '#f0f0f0'}`,
+                        transition: 'all 0.2s',
+                      }}
+                      onMouseEnter={e => {
+                        e.currentTarget.style.borderColor = isDark ? '#177ddc' : '#1890ff';
+                        e.currentTarget.style.background = isDark ? '#177ddc22' : '#1890ff11';
+                      }}
+                      onMouseLeave={e => {
+                        e.currentTarget.style.borderColor = isDark ? '#303030' : '#f0f0f0';
+                        e.currentTarget.style.background = isDark ? '#141414' : '#fafafa';
+                      }}
+                    >
+                      <Space size={4} style={{ marginBottom: 4 }}>
+                        <Tag color="blue" style={{ fontSize: 10 }}>{desc.expert_name}</Tag>
+                        <Tag style={{ fontSize: 10 }}>{desc.keyword}</Tag>
+                        <EditOutlined style={{ fontSize: 10, color: isDark ? '#177ddc' : '#1890ff' }} />
+                      </Space>
+                      <Paragraph
+                        ellipsis={{ rows: 2 }}
+                        style={{ marginBottom: 0, fontSize: 12 }}
+                      >
+                        {desc.description}
+                      </Paragraph>
+                    </div>
+                  ))}
+                </Space>
+              </Card>
+            )}
+
+            {/* Empty state when no descriptions */}
+            {(!descriptions || descriptions.length === 0) && (
+              <Card style={{ ...cardStyle, flex: 1 }}>
+                <Empty
+                  image={Empty.PRESENTED_IMAGE_SIMPLE}
+                  description={
+                    <Space direction="vertical">
+                      <Text>No generated descriptions available</Text>
+                      <Text type="secondary" style={{ fontSize: 12 }}>
+                        Run expert transformation first to generate descriptions
+                      </Text>
                     </Space>
                   }
+                />
+              </Card>
+            )}
+        </div>
+
+        {/* Right Column - Search Results */}
+        <div style={{
+          flex: 1,
+          minWidth: 0,
+          display: 'flex',
+          flexDirection: 'column',
+          overflow: 'auto',
+        }}>
+            <Card
+              size="small"
+              title={`Search Results (${searchResults.length} queries)`}
+              style={{ ...cardStyle, flex: 1, overflow: 'hidden', display: 'flex', flexDirection: 'column' }}
+              bodyStyle={{ flex: 1, overflow: 'auto', padding: 8 }}
+              extra={
+                searchResults.length > 0 && (
+                  <Button size="small" danger onClick={handleClearAll}>
+                    Clear All
+                  </Button>
+                )
+              }
+            >
+              {searchResults.length === 0 ? (
+                <Empty
+                  image={Empty.PRESENTED_IMAGE_SIMPLE}
                   description={
-                    <Paragraph
-                      ellipsis={{ rows: 2 }}
-                      style={{ marginBottom: 0, fontSize: 12 }}
-                    >
-                      {item.query}
-                    </Paragraph>
+                    <Space direction="vertical">
+                      <Text>No search results yet</Text>
+                      <Text type="secondary" style={{ fontSize: 12 }}>
+                        Enter a query or click a description to search
+                      </Text>
+                    </Space>
                   }
                 />
-              </List.Item>
-            )}
-          />
-        </Card>
-      )}
-
-      {/* Empty state */}
-      {searchItems.length === 0 && (!descriptions || descriptions.length === 0) && (
-        <Card style={cardStyle}>
-          <Empty
-            description={
-              <Space direction="vertical">
-                <Text>Enter a description or run transformations first</Text>
-                <Text type="secondary">
-                  Search links will open in Google Patents or Lens.org
-                </Text>
-              </Space>
-            }
-          />
-        </Card>
-      )}
-
-      {/* Empty state with descriptions but no search items */}
-      {searchItems.length === 0 && descriptions && descriptions.length > 0 && (
-        <Card style={cardStyle}>
-          <Empty
-            image={Empty.PRESENTED_IMAGE_SIMPLE}
-            description={
-              <Space direction="vertical">
-                <Text>Select descriptions above to add to search list</Text>
-                <Text type="secondary">
-                  Then click the links to search on Google Patents or Lens.org
-                </Text>
-              </Space>
-            }
-          />
-        </Card>
-      )}
+              ) : (
+                <Space direction="vertical" style={{ width: '100%' }} size={8}>
+                  {searchResults.map(result => (
+                    <Card
+                      key={result.id}
+                      size="small"
+                      style={{ background: isDark ? '#141414' : '#fafafa' }}
+                      title={
+                        <Space>
+                          <Text style={{ fontSize: 12, maxWidth: 300 }} ellipsis>
+                            {result.query.substring(0, 60)}{result.query.length > 60 ? '...' : ''}
+                          </Text>
+                          <Badge
+                            count={result.totalResults.toLocaleString()}
+                            style={{ backgroundColor: result.error ? '#ff4d4f' : '#52c41a' }}
+                            overflowCount={999999}
+                          />
+                        </Space>
+                      }
+                      extra={
+                        <Button
+                          type="text"
+                          size="small"
+                          danger
+                          icon={<DeleteOutlined />}
+                          onClick={() => handleRemoveResult(result.id)}
+                        />
+                      }
+                    >
+                      {result.error ? (
+                        <Text type="danger">{result.error}</Text>
+                      ) : result.patents.length === 0 ? (
+                        <Empty
+                          image={Empty.PRESENTED_IMAGE_SIMPLE}
+                          description={
+                            <Space direction="vertical" size={4}>
+                              <Text strong>No matching patents found</Text>
+                              <Text type="secondary" style={{ fontSize: 12 }}>
+                                This may indicate a novel concept with no existing prior art.
+                              </Text>
+                            </Space>
+                          }
+                        />
+                      ) : (
+                        <List
+                          size="small"
+                          dataSource={result.patents}
+                          renderItem={(patent) => {
+                            const status = getStatusDisplay(patent.legal_status);
+                            return (
+                              <List.Item
+                                style={{
+                                  padding: '8px',
+                                  borderBottom: `1px solid ${isDark ? '#303030' : '#f0f0f0'}`,
+                                }}
+                                actions={[
+                                  <Button
+                                    key="open"
+                                    type="link"
+                                    size="small"
+                                    icon={<LinkOutlined />}
+                                    href={patent.url}
+                                    target="_blank"
+                                  />,
+                                  <Button
+                                    key="copy"
+                                    type="text"
+                                    size="small"
+                                    icon={<CopyOutlined />}
+                                    onClick={() => handleCopyPatent(patent)}
+                                  />,
+                                ]}
+                              >
+                                <List.Item.Meta
+                                  title={
+                                    <Space direction="vertical" size={2}>
+                                      <Text strong style={{ fontSize: 13 }}>{patent.title || 'Untitled'}</Text>
+                                      <Space size={4} wrap>
+                                        <Tag>{patent.jurisdiction}-{patent.doc_number}</Tag>
+                                        <Tag color={status.color}>{status.text}</Tag>
+                                        {patent.date_published && (
+                                          <Text type="secondary" style={{ fontSize: 11 }}>
+                                            {patent.date_published}
+                                          </Text>
+                                        )}
+                                      </Space>
+                                    </Space>
+                                  }
+                                  description={
+                                    patent.abstract && (
+                                      <Paragraph
+                                        ellipsis={{ rows: 2, expandable: true, symbol: 'more' }}
+                                        style={{ marginBottom: 0, marginTop: 4, fontSize: 12 }}
+                                      >
+                                        {patent.abstract}
+                                      </Paragraph>
+                                    )
+                                  }
+                                />
+                              </List.Item>
+                            );
+                          }}
+                        />
+                      )}
+                    </Card>
+                  ))}
+                </Space>
+              )}
+            </Card>
+        </div>
     </div>
   );
 }
diff --git a/frontend/src/types/index.ts b/frontend/src/types/index.ts
index be0b3b2..248b61f 100644
--- a/frontend/src/types/index.ts
+++ b/frontend/src/types/index.ts
@@ -402,18 +402,22 @@ export interface CrossoverTransformationResult {
   transformedIdeas: ExpertTransformationDescription[];
 }
 
-// ===== Patent Search types =====
+// ===== Patent Search types (Lens.org API) =====
 
 export interface PatentResult {
-  publication_number: string;
+  lens_id: string;
+  doc_number: string;
+  jurisdiction: string;
+  kind: string;
   title: string;
-  snippet: string;
-  publication_date: string | null;
-  assignee: string | null;
-  inventor: string | null;
-  status: 'ACTIVE' | 'NOT_ACTIVE' | 'UNKNOWN';
-  pdf_url: string | null;
-  thumbnail_url: string | null;
+  abstract: string | null;
+  date_published: string | null;
+  applicants: string[];
+  inventors: string[];
+  legal_status: string | null;
+  classifications_cpc: string[];
+  families_simple: string[];
+  url: string;
 }
 
 export interface PatentSearchRequest {
diff --git a/research/experimental_protocol.md b/research/experimental_protocol.md
index 00c7cc0..004257d 100644
--- a/research/experimental_protocol.md
+++ b/research/experimental_protocol.md
@@ -10,29 +10,47 @@ This document outlines a comprehensive experimental design to test the hypothesi
 
 | ID | Research Question |
 |----|-------------------|
-| **RQ1** | Does multi-expert generation produce higher semantic diversity than direct LLM generation? |
-| **RQ2** | Does multi-expert generation produce ideas with lower patent overlap (higher novelty)? |
-| **RQ3** | What is the optimal number of experts for maximizing diversity? |
-| **RQ4** | How do different expert sources (LLM vs Curated vs DBpedia) affect idea quality? |
-| **RQ5** | Does structured attribute decomposition enhance the multi-expert effect? |
+| **RQ1** | Does attribute decomposition improve semantic diversity of generated ideas? |
+| **RQ2** | Does expert perspective transformation improve semantic diversity of generated ideas? |
+| **RQ3** | Is there an interaction effect between attribute decomposition and expert perspectives? |
+| **RQ4** | Which combination produces the highest patent novelty (lowest overlap)? |
+| **RQ5** | How do different expert sources (LLM vs Curated vs External) affect idea quality? |
+| **RQ6** | Does context-free keyword generation (current design) increase hallucination/nonsense rate? |
+
+### Design Note: Context-Free Keyword Generation
+
+Our system intentionally excludes the original query during keyword generation (Stage 1):
+
+```
+Stage 1 (Keyword): Expert sees "木質" (wood) + "會計師" (accountant)
+                   Expert does NOT see "椅子" (chair)
+                   → Generates: "資金流動" (cash flow)
+
+Stage 2 (Description): Expert sees "椅子" + "資金流動"
+                       → Applies keyword to original query
+```
+
+**Rationale**: This forces maximum semantic distance in keyword generation.
+**Risk**: Some keywords may be too distant, resulting in nonsensical or unusable ideas.
+**RQ6 investigates**: What is the hallucination/nonsense rate, and is the tradeoff worthwhile?
 
 ---
 
 ## 2. Experimental Design Overview
 
 ### 2.1 Design Type
-**Mixed Design**: Between-subjects for main conditions × Within-subjects for queries
+**2×2 Factorial Design**: Attribute Decomposition (With/Without) × Expert Perspectives (With/Without)
+- Within-subjects for queries (all queries tested across all conditions)
 
 ### 2.2 Variables
 
 #### Independent Variables (Manipulated)
 
-| Variable | Levels | Your System Parameter |
-|----------|--------|----------------------|
-| **Generation Method** | 5 levels (see conditions) | Condition-dependent |
-| **Expert Count** | 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 | `expert_count` |
-| **Expert Source** | LLM, Curated, DBpedia | `expert_source` |
-| **Attribute Structure** | With/Without decomposition | Pipeline inclusion |
+| Variable | Levels | Description |
+|----------|--------|-------------|
+| **Attribute Decomposition** | 2 levels: With / Without | Whether to decompose query into structured attributes |
+| **Expert Perspectives** | 2 levels: With / Without | Whether to use expert personas for idea generation |
+| **Expert Source** (secondary) | LLM, Curated, External | Source of expert occupations (tested within Expert=With conditions) |
 
 #### Dependent Variables (Measured)
 
@@ -61,34 +79,28 @@ This document outlines a comprehensive experimental design to test the hypothesi
 
 ## 3. Experimental Conditions
 
-### 3.1 Main Study: Generation Method Comparison
+### 3.1 Main Study: 2×2 Factorial Design
 
-| Condition | Description | Implementation |
-|-----------|-------------|----------------|
-| **C1: Direct** | Direct LLM generation | Prompt: "Generate 20 creative ideas for [query]" |
-| **C2: Single-Expert** | 1 expert × 20 ideas | `expert_count=1`, `keywords_per_expert=20` |
-| **C3: Multi-Expert-4** | 4 experts × 5 ideas each | `expert_count=4`, `keywords_per_expert=5` |
-| **C4: Multi-Expert-8** | 8 experts × 2-3 ideas each | `expert_count=8`, `keywords_per_expert=2-3` |
-| **C5: Random-Perspective** | 4 random words as "perspectives" | Custom prompt with random nouns |
+| Condition | Attributes | Experts | Description |
+|-----------|------------|---------|-------------|
+| **C1: Direct** | ❌ Without | ❌ Without | Baseline: "Generate 20 creative ideas for [query]" |
+| **C2: Expert-Only** | ❌ Without | ✅ With | Expert personas generate for whole query |
+| **C3: Attribute-Only** | ✅ With | ❌ Without | Decompose query, direct generate per attribute |
+| **C4: Full Pipeline** | ✅ With | ✅ With | Decompose query, experts generate per attribute |
 
-### 3.2 Expert Count Study
+### 3.2 Control Condition
 
-| Condition | Expert Count | Ideas per Expert |
-|-----------|--------------|------------------|
-| **E1** | 1 | 20 |
-| **E2** | 2 | 10 |
-| **E4** | 4 | 5 |
-| **E6** | 6 | 3-4 |
-| **E8** | 8 | 2-3 |
+| Condition | Description | Purpose |
+|-----------|-------------|---------|
+| **C5: Random-Perspective** | 4 random words as "perspectives" | Tests if ANY perspective shift helps, or if EXPERT knowledge specifically matters |
 
-### 3.3 Expert Source Study
+### 3.3 Expert Source Study (Secondary, within Expert=With conditions)
 
 | Condition | Source | Implementation |
 |-----------|--------|----------------|
-| **S-LLM** | LLM-generated | `expert_source=ExpertSource.LLM` |
-| **S-Curated** | Curated 210 occupations | `expert_source=ExpertSource.CURATED` |
-| **S-DBpedia** | DBpedia 2164 occupations | `expert_source=ExpertSource.DBPEDIA` |
-| **S-Random** | Random word "experts" | Custom implementation |
+| **S-LLM** | LLM-generated | Query-specific experts generated by LLM |
+| **S-Curated** | Curated occupations | Pre-selected high-quality occupations |
+| **S-External** | External sources | Wikidata/ConceptNet occupations |
 
 ---
 
@@ -251,7 +263,69 @@ def compute_patent_novelty(ideas: List[str], query: str) -> dict:
     }
 ```
 
-### 5.3 Metrics Summary Table
+### 5.3 Hallucination/Nonsense Metrics (RQ6)
+
+Since our design intentionally excludes the original query during keyword generation, we need to measure the "cost" of this approach.
+
+#### 5.3.1 LLM-as-Judge for Relevance
+```python
+def compute_relevance_score(query: str, ideas: List[str], judge_model: str) -> dict:
+    """
+    Use LLM to judge if each idea is relevant/applicable to the original query.
+    """
+    relevant_count = 0
+    nonsense_count = 0
+    results = []
+
+    for idea in ideas:
+        prompt = f"""
+        Original query: {query}
+        Generated idea: {idea}
+
+        Is this idea relevant and applicable to the original query?
+        Rate: 1 (nonsense/irrelevant), 2 (weak connection), 3 (relevant)
+
+        Return JSON: {{"score": N, "reason": "brief explanation"}}
+        """
+        result = llm_judge(prompt, model=judge_model)
+        results.append(result)
+        if result['score'] == 1:
+            nonsense_count += 1
+        elif result['score'] >= 2:
+            relevant_count += 1
+
+    return {
+        'relevance_rate': relevant_count / len(ideas),
+        'nonsense_rate': nonsense_count / len(ideas),
+        'details': results
+    }
+```
+
+#### 5.3.2 Semantic Distance Threshold Analysis
+```python
+def analyze_distance_threshold(query: str, ideas: List[str], embedding_model: str) -> dict:
+    """
+    Analyze which ideas exceed a "too far" semantic distance threshold.
+    Ideas beyond threshold may be creative OR nonsensical.
+    """
+    query_emb = get_embedding(query, model=embedding_model)
+    idea_embs = get_embeddings(ideas, model=embedding_model)
+
+    distances = [1 - cosine_similarity(query_emb, e) for e in idea_embs]
+
+    # Define thresholds (to be calibrated)
+    CREATIVE_THRESHOLD = 0.6  # Ideas this far are "creative"
+    NONSENSE_THRESHOLD = 0.85  # Ideas this far may be "nonsense"
+
+    return {
+        'creative_zone': sum(1 for d in distances if CREATIVE_THRESHOLD <= d < NONSENSE_THRESHOLD),
+        'potential_nonsense': sum(1 for d in distances if d >= NONSENSE_THRESHOLD),
+        'safe_zone': sum(1 for d in distances if d < CREATIVE_THRESHOLD),
+        'distance_distribution': distances
+    }
+```
+
+### 5.4 Metrics Summary Table
 
 | Metric | Formula | Interpretation |
 |--------|---------|----------------|
@@ -261,6 +335,18 @@ def compute_patent_novelty(ideas: List[str], query: str) -> dict:
 | **Query Distance** | 1 - cos_sim(query, idea) | Higher = farther from original |
 | **Patent Novelty Rate** | 1 - (matches / total) | Higher = more novel |
 
+### 5.5 Nonsense/Hallucination Analysis (RQ6) - Three Methods
+
+| Method | Metric | How it works | Pros/Cons |
+|--------|--------|--------------|-----------|
+| **Automatic** | Semantic Distance Threshold | Ideas with distance > 0.85 flagged as "potential nonsense" | Fast, cheap; May miss contextual nonsense |
+| **LLM-as-Judge** | Relevance Score (1-3) | GPT-4 rates if idea is relevant to original query | Moderate cost; Good balance |
+| **Human Evaluation** | Relevance Rating (1-7 Likert) | Humans rate coherence/relevance | Gold standard; Most expensive |
+
+**Triangulation**: Compare all three methods to validate findings:
+- If automatic + LLM + human agree → high confidence
+- If they disagree → investigate why (interesting edge cases)
+
 ---
 
 ## 6. Human Evaluation Protocol
@@ -306,6 +392,22 @@ How creative is this idea overall?
 7 = Extremely creative
 ```
 
+#### 6.2.4 Relevance/Coherence (7-point Likert) - For RQ6
+```
+How relevant and coherent is this idea to the original query?
+1 = Nonsense/completely irrelevant (no logical connection)
+2 = Very weak connection (hard to see relevance)
+3 = Weak connection (requires stretch to see relevance)
+4 = Moderate connection (somewhat relevant)
+5 = Good connection (clearly relevant)
+6 = Strong connection (directly applicable)
+7 = Perfect fit (highly relevant and coherent)
+```
+
+**Note**: This scale specifically measures the "cost" of context-free generation.
+- Ideas with high novelty but low relevance (1-3) = potential hallucination
+- Ideas with high novelty AND high relevance (5-7) = successful creative leap
+
 ### 6.3 Procedure
 
 1. **Introduction** (5 min)
@@ -361,21 +463,27 @@ For each query Q in QuerySet:
     For each condition C in Conditions:
 
         If C == "Direct":
+            # No attributes, no experts
             ideas = direct_llm_generation(Q, n=20)
 
-        Elif C == "Single-Expert":
-            expert = generate_expert(Q, n=1)
-            ideas = expert_transformation(Q, expert, ideas_per_expert=20)
-
-        Elif C == "Multi-Expert-4":
+        Elif C == "Expert-Only":
+            # No attributes, with experts
             experts = generate_experts(Q, n=4)
-            ideas = expert_transformation(Q, experts, ideas_per_expert=5)
+            ideas = expert_generation_whole_query(Q, experts, ideas_per_expert=5)
 
-        Elif C == "Multi-Expert-8":
-            experts = generate_experts(Q, n=8)
-            ideas = expert_transformation(Q, experts, ideas_per_expert=2-3)
+        Elif C == "Attribute-Only":
+            # With attributes, no experts
+            attributes = decompose_attributes(Q)
+            ideas = direct_generation_per_attribute(Q, attributes, ideas_per_attr=5)
+
+        Elif C == "Full-Pipeline":
+            # With attributes, with experts
+            attributes = decompose_attributes(Q)
+            experts = generate_experts(Q, n=4)
+            ideas = expert_transformation(Q, attributes, experts, ideas_per_combo=1-2)
 
         Elif C == "Random-Perspective":
+            # Control: random words instead of experts
             perspectives = random.sample(RANDOM_WORDS, 4)
             ideas = perspective_generation(Q, perspectives, ideas_per=5)
 
@@ -469,20 +577,34 @@ Plot: Expert count vs diversity curve
 
 ## 9. Expected Results & Hypotheses
 
-### 9.1 Primary Hypotheses
+### 9.1 Primary Hypotheses (2×2 Factorial)
 
 | Hypothesis | Prediction | Metric |
 |------------|------------|--------|
-| **H1** | Multi-Expert-4 > Single-Expert > Direct | Semantic diversity |
-| **H2** | Multi-Expert-8 ≈ Multi-Expert-4 (diminishing returns) | Semantic diversity |
-| **H3** | Multi-Expert > Direct | Patent novelty rate |
-| **H4** | LLM experts > Curated > DBpedia | Unconventionality |
-| **H5** | With attributes > Without attributes | Overall diversity |
+| **H1: Main Effect of Attributes** | Attribute-Only > Direct | Semantic diversity |
+| **H2: Main Effect of Experts** | Expert-Only > Direct | Semantic diversity |
+| **H3: Interaction Effect** | Full Pipeline > (Attribute-Only + Expert-Only - Direct) | Semantic diversity |
+| **H4: Novelty** | Full Pipeline > all other conditions | Patent novelty rate |
+| **H5: Expert vs Random** | Expert-Only > Random-Perspective | Validates expert knowledge matters |
+| **H6: Novelty-Usefulness Tradeoff** | Full Pipeline has higher nonsense rate than Direct, but acceptable (<20%) | Nonsense rate |
 
-### 9.2 Expected Effect Sizes
+### 9.2 Expected Pattern
+
+```
+                    Without Experts    With Experts
+                    ---------------    ------------
+Without Attributes    Direct (low)      Expert-Only (medium)
+With Attributes       Attr-Only (medium) Full Pipeline (high)
+```
+
+**Expected interaction**: The combination (Full Pipeline) should produce super-additive effects - the benefit of experts is amplified when combined with structured attributes.
+
+### 9.3 Expected Effect Sizes
 
 Based on related work:
-- Diversity increase: d = 0.5-0.8 (medium to large)
+- Main effect of attributes: d = 0.3-0.5 (small to medium)
+- Main effect of experts: d = 0.4-0.6 (medium)
+- Interaction effect: d = 0.2-0.4 (small)
 - Patent novelty increase: 20-40% improvement
 - Human creativity rating: d = 0.3-0.5 (small to medium)
 
diff --git a/research/literature_review.md b/research/literature_review.md
index 74a1bdd..09e355b 100644
--- a/research/literature_review.md
+++ b/research/literature_review.md
@@ -14,7 +14,26 @@ Groups of people tend to generate more diverse ideas than individuals because ea
 
 PersonaFlow provides multiple perspectives by using LLMs to simulate domain-specific experts. User studies showed it increased the perceived relevance and creativity of ideated research directions and promoted users' critical thinking activities without increasing perceived cognitive load.
 
-**Gap for our work**: PersonaFlow focuses on research ideation. Our system applies to product/innovation ideation with structured attribute decomposition.
+**Critical Gap - Our Key Differentiation**:
+
+```
+PersonaFlow approach:
+  Query → Experts → Ideas
+  (Experts see the WHOLE query, no problem structure)
+
+Our approach:
+  Query → Attribute Decomposition → (Attributes × Experts) → Ideas
+  (Experts see SPECIFIC attributes, systematic coverage)
+```
+
+| Limitation of PersonaFlow | Our Solution |
+|---------------------------|--------------|
+| No problem structure | Attribute decomposition structures the problem space |
+| Experts applied to whole query | Experts applied to specific attributes |
+| Cannot test what helps (experts vs structure) | 2×2 factorial isolates each contribution |
+| Implicit/random coverage of idea space | Systematic coverage via attribute × expert matrix |
+
+**Our unique contribution**: We hypothesize that attribute decomposition **amplifies** expert effectiveness (interaction effect). PersonaFlow cannot test this because they never decomposed the problem.
 
 ### 1.3 PopBlends: Conceptual Blending with LLMs
 **PopBlends: Strategies for Conceptual Blending with Large Language Models** (CHI 2023)
diff --git a/research/paper_outline.md b/research/paper_outline.md
index f846878..8c55bb6 100644
--- a/research/paper_outline.md
+++ b/research/paper_outline.md
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
 
 ## Abstract (Draft)
 
-Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for creative ideation, yet they exhibit a phenomenon we term "semantic gravity" - the tendency to generate outputs clustered around high-probability regions of their training distribution. This limits the novelty and diversity of generated ideas. We propose a multi-expert transformation framework that systematically activates diverse semantic regions by conditioning LLM generation on simulated expert perspectives. Our system decomposes concepts into structured attributes, generates ideas through multiple domain-expert viewpoints, and employs semantic deduplication to ensure genuine diversity. Through experiments comparing multi-expert generation against direct LLM generation and single-expert baselines, we demonstrate that our approach produces ideas with [X]% higher semantic diversity and [Y]% lower patent overlap. We contribute a theoretical framework explaining LLM creativity limitations and an open-source system for innovation ideation.
+Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for creative ideation, yet they exhibit a phenomenon we term "semantic gravity" - the tendency to generate outputs clustered around high-probability regions of their training distribution. This limits the novelty and diversity of generated ideas. We investigate two complementary strategies to overcome this limitation: (1) **attribute decomposition**, which structures the problem space before creative exploration, and (2) **expert perspective transformation**, which conditions LLM generation on simulated domain-expert viewpoints. Through a 2×2 factorial experiment comparing Direct generation, Expert-Only, Attribute-Only, and Full Pipeline (both factors combined), we demonstrate that each factor independently improves semantic diversity, with the combination producing super-additive effects. Our Full Pipeline achieves [X]% higher semantic diversity and [Y]% lower patent overlap compared to direct generation. We contribute a theoretical framework explaining LLM creativity limitations and an open-source system for innovation ideation.
 
 ---
 
@@ -61,8 +61,17 @@ Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for creative ideation, yet th
 - Evaluation methods (CAT, semantic distance)
 
 ### 2.5 Positioning Our Work
-- Gap: No end-to-end system combining structured decomposition + multi-expert transformation + deduplication
-- Distinction from PersonaFlow: product innovation focus, attribute structure
+
+**Key distinction from PersonaFlow (closest related work)**:
+```
+PersonaFlow:   Query → Experts → Ideas (no problem structure)
+Our approach:  Query → Attributes → (Attributes × Experts) → Ideas
+```
+
+- PersonaFlow applies experts to whole query; we apply experts to decomposed attributes
+- PersonaFlow cannot isolate what helps; our 2×2 factorial design tests each factor
+- We hypothesize attribute decomposition **amplifies** expert effectiveness (interaction effect)
+- PersonaFlow showed experts help; we test whether **structuring the problem first** makes experts more effective
 
 ---
 
@@ -102,30 +111,41 @@ Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for creative ideation, yet th
 ## 4. Experiments
 
 ### 4.1 Research Questions
-- RQ1: Does multi-expert generation increase semantic diversity?
-- RQ2: Does multi-expert generation reduce patent overlap?
-- RQ3: What is the optimal number of experts?
-- RQ4: How do expert sources affect output quality?
+- RQ1: Does attribute decomposition improve semantic diversity?
+- RQ2: Does expert perspective transformation improve semantic diversity?
+- RQ3: Is there an interaction effect between the two factors?
+- RQ4: Which combination produces the highest patent novelty?
+- RQ5: How do expert sources (LLM vs Curated vs External) affect quality?
+- RQ6: What is the hallucination/nonsense rate of context-free keyword generation?
+
+### 4.1.1 Design Note: Context-Free Keyword Generation
+Our system intentionally excludes the original query during keyword generation:
+- Stage 1: Expert sees attribute only (e.g., "wood" + "accountant"), NOT the query ("chair")
+- Stage 2: Expert applies keyword to original query with context
+- Rationale: Maximize semantic distance for novelty
+- Risk: Some ideas may be too distant (nonsense/hallucination)
+- RQ6 investigates this tradeoff
 
 ### 4.2 Experimental Setup
 
 #### 4.2.1 Dataset
-- N concepts/queries for ideation
-- Selection criteria (diverse domains, complexity levels)
+- 30 queries for ideation (see experimental_protocol.md)
+- Selection criteria: diverse domains, complexity levels
+- Categories: everyday objects, technology/tools, services/systems
 
-#### 4.2.2 Conditions
-| Condition | Description |
-|-----------|-------------|
-| Baseline | Direct LLM: "Generate 20 creative ideas for X" |
-| Single-Expert | 1 expert × 20 ideas |
-| Multi-Expert-4 | 4 experts × 5 ideas each |
-| Multi-Expert-8 | 8 experts × 2-3 ideas each |
-| Random-Perspective | 4 random words as "perspectives" |
+#### 4.2.2 Conditions (2×2 Factorial Design)
+| Condition | Attributes | Experts | Description |
+|-----------|------------|---------|-------------|
+| **C1: Direct** | ❌ | ❌ | Baseline: "Generate 20 creative ideas for [query]" |
+| **C2: Expert-Only** | ❌ | ✅ | Expert personas generate for whole query |
+| **C3: Attribute-Only** | ✅ | ❌ | Decompose query, direct generate per attribute |
+| **C4: Full Pipeline** | ✅ | ✅ | Decompose query, experts generate per attribute |
+| **C5: Random-Perspective** | ❌ | (random) | Control: 4 random words as "perspectives" |
 
 #### 4.2.3 Controls
 - Same LLM model (specify version)
 - Same temperature settings
-- Same total idea count per condition
+- Same total idea count per condition (20 ideas)
 
 ### 4.3 Metrics
 
@@ -142,8 +162,18 @@ Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for creative ideation, yet th
 - Novelty rating (1-7 Likert)
 - Usefulness rating (1-7 Likert)
 - Creativity rating (1-7 Likert)
+- **Relevance rating (1-7 Likert) - for RQ6**
 - Interrater reliability (Cronbach's alpha)
 
+#### 4.3.4 Nonsense/Hallucination Analysis (RQ6) - Three Methods
+| Method | Metric | Purpose |
+|--------|--------|---------|
+| Automatic | Semantic distance threshold (>0.85) | Fast screening |
+| LLM-as-Judge | GPT-4 relevance score (1-3) | Scalable evaluation |
+| Human | Relevance rating (1-7 Likert) | Gold standard validation |
+
+Triangulate all three to validate findings
+
 ### 4.4 Procedure
 - Idea generation process
 - Evaluation process
@@ -153,27 +183,44 @@ Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for creative ideation, yet th
 
 ## 5. Results
 
-### 5.1 Semantic Diversity (RQ1)
+### 5.1 Main Effect of Attribute Decomposition (RQ1)
+- Compare: (Attribute-Only + Full Pipeline) vs (Direct + Expert-Only)
 - Quantitative results
-- Visualization (t-SNE/UMAP of idea embeddings)
-- Statistical significance tests
+- Statistical significance (ANOVA main effect)
 
-### 5.2 Patent Novelty (RQ2)
+### 5.2 Main Effect of Expert Perspectives (RQ2)
+- Compare: (Expert-Only + Full Pipeline) vs (Direct + Attribute-Only)
+- Quantitative results
+- Statistical significance (ANOVA main effect)
+
+### 5.3 Interaction Effect (RQ3)
+- 2×2 interaction analysis
+- Visualization: interaction plot
+- Evidence for super-additive vs additive effects
+
+### 5.4 Patent Novelty (RQ4)
 - Overlap rates by condition
+- Full Pipeline vs other conditions
 - Examples of high-novelty ideas
 
-### 5.3 Expert Count Analysis (RQ3)
-- Diversity vs. expert count curve
-- Diminishing returns analysis
-- Optimal expert count recommendation
-
-### 5.4 Expert Source Comparison (RQ4)
-- LLM-generated vs. curated vs. random
+### 5.5 Expert Source Comparison (RQ5)
+- LLM-generated vs curated vs external
 - Unconventionality metrics
+- Within Expert=With conditions only
 
-### 5.5 Human Evaluation Results
-- Rating distributions
-- Condition comparisons
+### 5.6 Control Condition Analysis
+- Expert-Only vs Random-Perspective
+- Validates expert knowledge matters
+
+### 5.7 Hallucination/Nonsense Analysis (RQ6)
+- Nonsense rate by condition (LLM-as-judge)
+- Semantic distance threshold analysis
+- Novelty-usefulness tradeoff visualization
+- Is the context-free design worth the hallucination cost?
+
+### 5.8 Human Evaluation Results
+- Rating distributions by condition
+- 2×2 pattern in human judgments
 - Correlation with automatic metrics
 
 ---
@@ -181,14 +228,14 @@ Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for creative ideation, yet th
 ## 6. Discussion
 
 ### 6.1 Interpreting the Results
-- Why multi-expert works
-- The role of structured decomposition
-- Deduplication importance
+- Why each factor contributes independently
+- The interaction: why attributes amplify expert effectiveness
+- Theoretical explanation via conceptual blending
 
 ### 6.2 Theoretical Implications
 - Semantic gravity as framework for LLM creativity
-- Expert perspectives as productive constraints
-- Inner crowd wisdom
+- Two complementary escape mechanisms
+- Structured decomposition as "scaffolding" for creative exploration
 
 ### 6.3 Practical Implications
 - When to use multi-expert approach
diff --git a/research/research_report.md b/research/research_report.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..197b91d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/research/research_report.md
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+---
+marp: true
+theme: default
+paginate: true
+size: 16:9
+style: |
+  section {
+    font-size: 24px;
+  }
+  h1 {
+    color: #2563eb;
+  }
+  h2 {
+    color: #1e40af;
+  }
+  table {
+    font-size: 20px;
+  }
+  .columns {
+    display: grid;
+    grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;
+    gap: 1rem;
+  }
+---
+
+# Breaking Semantic Gravity
+## Expert-Augmented LLM Ideation for Enhanced Creativity
+
+**Research Progress Report**
+
+January 2026
+
+---
+
+# Agenda
+
+1. Research Problem & Motivation
+2. Theoretical Framework: "Semantic Gravity"
+3. Proposed Solution: Expert-Augmented Ideation
+4. Experimental Design
+5. Implementation Progress
+6. Timeline & Next Steps
+
+---
+
+# 1. Research Problem
+
+## The Myth, Problem and Myth of LLM Creativity
+
+**Myth**: LLMs enable infinite idea generation for creative tasks
+
+**Problem**: Generated ideas lack **diversity** and **novelty**
+
+- Ideas cluster around high-probability training distributions
+- Limited exploration of distant conceptual spaces
+- "Creative" outputs are **interpolations**, not **extrapolations**
+
+---
+
+# The "Semantic Gravity" Phenomenon
+
+```
+Direct LLM Generation:
+  Input: "Generate creative ideas for a chair"
+
+  Result:
+    - "Ergonomic office chair"      (high probability)
+    - "Foldable portable chair"     (high probability)
+    - "Eco-friendly bamboo chair"   (moderate probability)
+
+  Problem:
+    → Ideas cluster in predictable semantic neighborhoods
+    → Limited exploration of distant conceptual spaces
+```
+
+---
+
+# Why Does Semantic Gravity Occur?
+
+| Factor | Description |
+|--------|-------------|
+| **Statistical Pattern Learning** | LLMs learn co-occurrence patterns from training data |
+| **Model Collapse** (再看看) | Sampling from "creative ideas" distribution seen in training |
+| **Relevance Trap** (再看看) | Strong associations dominate weak ones |
+| **Domain Bias** | Outputs gravitate toward category prototypes |
+
+
+
+---
+
+# 2. Theoretical Framework
+
+## Three Key Foundations
+
+1. **Semantic Distance Theory** (Mednick, 1962)
+   - Creativity correlates with conceptual "jump" distance
+
+2. **Conceptual Blending Theory** (Fauconnier & Turner, 2002)
+   - Creative products emerge from blending input spaces
+
+3. **Design Fixation** (Jansson & Smith, 1991)
+   - Blind adherence to initial ideas limits creativity
+
+---
+
+# Semantic Distance in Action
+
+```
+Without Expert:
+  "Chair" → furniture, sitting, comfort, design
+  Semantic distance: SHORT
+
+With Marine Biologist Expert:
+  "Chair" → underwater pressure, coral structure, buoyancy
+  Semantic distance: LONG
+
+Result: Novel ideas like "pressure-adaptive seating"
+```
+
+**Key Insight**: Expert perspectives force semantic jumps that LLMs wouldn't naturally make.
+
+---
+
+# 3. Proposed Solution
+
+## Expert-Augmented LLM Ideation Pipeline
+
+```
+┌──────────────┐   ┌──────────────┐   ┌──────────────┐
+│   Attribute  │ → │    Expert    │ → │    Expert    │
+│ Decomposition│   │  Generation  │   │Transformation│
+└──────────────┘   └──────────────┘   └──────────────┘
+                                              │
+                                              ▼
+                   ┌──────────────┐   ┌──────────────┐
+                   │   Novelty    │ ← │ Deduplication│
+                   │  Validation  │   │              │
+                   └──────────────┘   └──────────────┘
+```
+
+---
+
+# From "Wisdom of Crowds" to "Inner Crowd"
+
+**Traditional Crowd**:
+- Person 1 → Ideas from perspective 1
+- Person 2 → Ideas from perspective 2
+- Aggregation → Diverse idea pool
+
+**Our "Inner Crowd"**:
+- LLM + Expert 1 Persona → Ideas from perspective 1
+- LLM + Expert 2 Persona → Ideas from perspective 2
+- Aggregation → Diverse idea pool (simulated crowd)
+
+---
+
+# Expert Sources
+
+| Source | Description | Coverage |
+|--------|-------------|----------|
+| **LLM-Generated** | Query-specific, prioritizes unconventional | Flexible |
+| **Curated** | 210 pre-selected high-quality occupations | Controlled |
+| **DBpedia** | 2,164 occupations from database | Broad |
+
+Note: use the domain list (嘗試加入杜威分類法兩層? Future work?  )
+
+---
+
+# 4. Research Questions (2×2 Factorial Design)
+
+| ID | Research Question |
+|----|-------------------|
+| **RQ1** | Does attribute decomposition improve semantic diversity? |
+| **RQ2** | Does expert perspective transformation improve semantic diversity? |
+| **RQ3** | Is there an interaction effect between the two factors? |
+| **RQ4** | Which combination produces the highest patent novelty? |
+| **RQ5** | How do expert sources (LLM vs Curated vs External) affect quality? |
+| **RQ6** | What is the hallucination/nonsense rate of context-free generation? |
+
+---
+
+# Design Choice: Context-Free Keyword Generation
+
+Our system intentionally excludes the original query during keyword generation:
+
+```
+Stage 1 (Keyword):     Expert sees "木質" (wood) + "會計師" (accountant)
+                       Expert does NOT see "椅子" (chair)
+                       → Generates: "資金流動" (cash flow)
+
+Stage 2 (Description): Expert sees "椅子" + "資金流動"
+                       → Applies keyword to original query
+```
+
+**Rationale**: Forces maximum semantic distance for novelty
+**Risk**: Some keywords may be too distant → nonsense/hallucination
+**RQ6**: Measure this tradeoff
+
+---
+
+# The Semantic Distance Tradeoff
+
+```
+Too Close                 Optimal Zone                   Too Far
+(Semantic Gravity)        (Creative)                     (Hallucination)
+├─────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────┼─────────────────────────┤
+"Ergonomic office chair"  "Pressure-adaptive seating"    "Quantum chair consciousness"
+
+High usefulness           High novelty + useful          High novelty, nonsense
+Low novelty                                              Low usefulness
+```
+
+**H6**: Full Pipeline has higher nonsense rate than Direct, but acceptable (<20%)
+
+---
+
+# Measuring Nonsense/Hallucination (RQ6) - Three Methods
+
+| Method | Metric | Pros | Cons |
+|--------|--------|------|------|
+| **Automatic** | Semantic distance > 0.85 | Fast, cheap | May miss contextual nonsense |
+| **LLM-as-Judge** | GPT-4 relevance score (1-3) | Moderate cost, scalable | Potential LLM bias |
+| **Human Evaluation** | Relevance rating (1-7 Likert) | Gold standard | Expensive, slow |
+
+**Triangulation**: Compare all three methods
+- Agreement → high confidence in nonsense detection
+- Disagreement → interesting edge cases to analyze
+
+---
+
+# Core Hypotheses (2×2 Factorial)
+
+| Hypothesis | Prediction | Metric |
+|------------|------------|--------|
+| **H1: Attributes** | (Attr-Only + Full) > (Direct + Expert-Only) | Semantic diversity |
+| **H2: Experts** | (Expert-Only + Full) > (Direct + Attr-Only) | Semantic diversity |
+| **H3: Interaction** | Full > (Attr-Only + Expert-Only - Direct) | Super-additive effect |
+| **H4: Novelty** | Full Pipeline > all others | Patent novelty rate |
+| **H5: Control** | Expert-Only > Random-Perspective | Validates expert knowledge |
+| **H6: Tradeoff** | Full Pipeline nonsense rate < 20% | Nonsense rate |
+
+---
+
+# Experimental Conditions (2×2 Factorial)
+
+| Condition | Attributes | Experts | Description |
+|-----------|------------|---------|-------------|
+| **C1: Direct** | ❌ | ❌ | Baseline: "Generate 20 ideas for [query]" |
+| **C2: Expert-Only** | ❌ | ✅ | Expert personas generate for whole query |
+| **C3: Attribute-Only** | ✅ | ❌ | Decompose query, direct generate per attribute |
+| **C4: Full Pipeline** | ✅ | ✅ | Decompose query, experts generate per attribute |
+| **C5: Random-Perspective** | ❌ | (random) | Control: random words as "perspectives" |
+
+---
+
+# Expected 2×2 Pattern
+
+```
+                      Without Experts       With Experts
+                      ---------------       ------------
+Without Attributes    Direct (low)          Expert-Only (medium)
+
+With Attributes       Attr-Only (medium)    Full Pipeline (high)
+```
+
+**Key prediction**: The combination (Full Pipeline) produces **super-additive** effects
+- Experts are more effective when given structured attributes to transform
+- The interaction term should be statistically significant
+
+---
+
+# Query Dataset (30 Queries)
+
+**Category A: Everyday Objects (10)**
+- Chair, Umbrella, Backpack, Coffee mug, Bicycle...
+
+**Category B: Technology & Tools (10)**
+- Solar panel, Electric vehicle, 3D printer, Drone...
+
+**Category C: Services & Systems (10)**
+- Food delivery, Online education, Healthcare appointment...
+
+**Total**: 30 queries × 5 conditions (4 factorial + 1 control) × 20 ideas = **3,000 ideas**
+
+---
+
+# Metrics: Stastic Evaluation
+
+| Metric | Formula | Interpretation |
+|--------|---------|----------------|
+| **Mean Pairwise Distance** | avg(1 - cos_sim(i, j)) | Higher = more diverse |
+| **Silhouette Score** | Cluster cohesion vs separation | Higher = clearer clusters |
+| **Query Distance** | 1 - cos_sim(query, idea) | Higher = farther from original |
+| **Patent Novelty Rate** | 1 - (matches / total) | Higher = more novel |
+
+---
+
+# Metrics: Human Evaluation
+
+**Participants**: 60 evaluators (Prolific/MTurk)
+
+**Rating Scales** (7-point Likert):
+
+- **Novelty**: How novel/surprising is this idea?
+- **Usefulness**: How practical is this idea?
+- **Creativity**: How creative is this idea overall?
+- **Relevance**: How relevant/coherent is this idea to the query? **(RQ6)**
+- Nonsense ? 
+
+**Quality Control**:
+
+- Attention checks, completion time monitoring
+- Inter-rater reliability (Cronbach's α > 0.7)
+
+---
+
+# What is Prolific/MTurk?
+
+Online platforms for recruiting human participants for research studies.
+
+| Platform | Description | Best For |
+|----------|-------------|----------|
+| **Prolific** | Academic-focused crowdsourcing | Research studies (higher quality) |
+| **MTurk** | Amazon Mechanical Turk | Large-scale tasks (lower cost) |
+
+**How it works for our study**:
+1. Upload 600 ideas to evaluate (subset of generated ideas)
+2. Recruit 60 participants (~$8-15/hour compensation)
+3. Each participant rates ~30 ideas (novelty, usefulness, creativity)
+4. Download ratings → statistical analysis
+
+**Cost estimate**: 60 participants × 30 min × $12/hr = ~$360
+
+---
+
+# Alternative: LLM-as-Judge
+
+If human evaluation is too expensive or time-consuming:
+
+| Approach | Pros | Cons |
+|----------|------|------|
+| **Human (Prolific/MTurk)** | Gold standard, publishable | Cost, time, IRB approval |
+| **LLM-as-Judge (GPT-4)** | Fast, cheap, reproducible | Less rigorous, potential bias |
+| **Automatic metrics only** | No human cost | Missing subjective quality |
+
+**Recommendation**: Start with automatic metrics, add human evaluation for final paper submission.
+
+---
+
+# 5. Implementation Status
+
+## System Components (Implemented)
+
+- Attribute decomposition pipeline
+- Expert team generation (LLM, Curated, DBpedia sources)
+- Expert transformation with parallel processing
+- Semantic deduplication (embedding + LLM methods)
+- Patent search integration
+- Web-based visualization interface
+
+---
+
+# Implementation Checklist
+
+### Experiment Scripts (To Do)
+- [ ] `experiments/generate_ideas.py` - Idea generation
+- [ ] `experiments/compute_metrics.py` - Automatic metrics
+- [ ] `experiments/export_for_evaluation.py` - Human evaluation prep
+- [ ] `experiments/analyze_results.py` - Statistical analysis
+- [ ] `experiments/visualize.py` - Generate figures
+
+---
+
+# 6. Timeline
+
+| Phase | Activity |
+|-------|----------|
+| **Phase 1** | Implement idea generation scripts |
+| **Phase 2** | Generate all ideas (5 conditions × 30 queries) |
+| **Phase 3** | Compute automatic metrics |
+| **Phase 4** | Design and pilot human evaluation |
+| **Phase 5** | Run human evaluation (60 participants) |
+| **Phase 6** | Analyze results and write paper |
+
+---
+
+# Target Venues
+
+### Tier 1 (Recommended)
+- **CHI** - ACM Conference on Human Factors (Sept deadline)
+- **CSCW** - Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (Apr/Jan deadline)
+- **Creativity & Cognition** - Specialized computational creativity
+
+### Journal Options
+- **IJHCS** - International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
+- **TOCHI** - ACM Transactions on CHI
+
+---
+
+# Key Contributions
+
+1. **Theoretical**: "Semantic gravity" framework + two-factor solution
+
+2. **Methodological**: 2×2 factorial design isolates attribute vs expert contributions
+
+3. **Empirical**: Quantitative evidence for interaction effects in LLM creativity
+
+4. **Practical**: Open-source system with both factors for maximum diversity
+
+---
+
+# Key Differentiator vs PersonaFlow
+
+```
+PersonaFlow (2024):   Query → Experts → Ideas
+                      (Experts see WHOLE query, no structure)
+
+Our Approach:         Query → Attributes → (Attributes × Experts) → Ideas
+                      (Experts see SPECIFIC attributes, systematic)
+```
+
+**What we can answer that PersonaFlow cannot:**
+1. Does problem structure alone help? (Attribute-Only vs Direct)
+2. Do experts help beyond structure? (Full vs Attribute-Only)
+3. Is there an interaction effect? (amplification hypothesis)
+
+---
+
+# Related Work Comparison
+
+| Approach | Limitation | Our Advantage |
+|----------|------------|---------------|
+| Direct LLM | Semantic gravity | Two-factor enhancement |
+| **PersonaFlow** | **No problem structure** | **Attribute decomposition amplifies experts** |
+| PopBlends | Two-concept only | Systematic attribute × expert matrix |
+| BILLY | Cannot isolate factors | 2×2 factorial isolates contributions |
+
+---
+
+# References (Key Papers)
+
+1. Siangliulue et al. (2017) - Wisdom of Crowds via Role Assumption
+2. Liu et al. (2024) - PersonaFlow: LLM-Simulated Expert Perspectives
+3. Choi et al. (2023) - PopBlends: Conceptual Blending with LLMs
+4. Wadinambiarachchi et al. (2024) - Effects of Generative AI on Design Fixation
+5. Mednick (1962) - Semantic Distance Theory
+6. Fauconnier & Turner (2002) - Conceptual Blending Theory
+
+*Full reference list: 55+ papers in `research/references.md`*
+
+---
+
+# Questions & Discussion
+
+## Next Steps
+1. Finalize experimental design details
+2. Implement experiment scripts
+3. Collect pilot data for validation
+4. Submit IRB for human evaluation (if needed)
+
+---
+
+# Thank You
+
+**Project Repository**: novelty-seeking
+
+**Research Materials**:
+- `research/literature_review.md`
+- `research/theoretical_framework.md`
+- `research/experimental_protocol.md`
+- `research/paper_outline.md`
+- `research/references.md`
diff --git a/research/theoretical_framework.md b/research/theoretical_framework.md
index 6f4c6ca..ecc430b 100644
--- a/research/theoretical_framework.md
+++ b/research/theoretical_framework.md
@@ -59,6 +59,27 @@ With Marine Biologist Expert:
 Result: Novel ideas like "pressure-adaptive seating" or "coral-inspired structural support"
 ```
 
+#### The Semantic Distance Tradeoff
+
+However, semantic distance is not always beneficial. There exists a tradeoff:
+
+```
+Semantic Distance Spectrum:
+
+Too Close                    Optimal Zone                    Too Far
+(Semantic Gravity)           (Creative)                      (Hallucination)
+├────────────────────────────┼────────────────────────────────┼────────────────────────────┤
+"Ergonomic office chair"     "Pressure-adaptive seating"     "Quantum-entangled
+                             "Coral-inspired support"         chair consciousness"
+
+High usefulness              High novelty + useful            High novelty, nonsense
+Low novelty                                                   Low usefulness
+```
+
+**Our Design Choice**: Context-free keyword generation (Stage 1 excludes original query) intentionally pushes toward the "far" end to maximize novelty. Stage 2 re-introduces query context to ground the ideas.
+
+**Research Question**: What is the hallucination/nonsense rate of this approach, and is the tradeoff worthwhile?
+
 #### 2. Conceptual Blending Theory (Fauconnier & Turner, 2002)
 
 > "Creative products emerge from blending elements of two input spaces into a novel integrated space."
@@ -136,12 +157,22 @@ Our "Inner Crowd":
   Aggregation → Diverse idea pool (simulated crowd)
 ```
 
-### Why Multiple Experts Work
+### Why This Approach Works: Two Complementary Mechanisms
 
-1. **Coverage**: Different experts activate different semantic regions
-2. **Redundancy Reduction**: Deduplication removes overlapping ideas
-3. **Diversity by Design**: Expert selection can be optimized for maximum diversity
-4. **Diminishing Returns**: Beyond ~4-6 experts, marginal diversity gains decrease
+**Factor 1: Attribute Decomposition**
+- Structures the problem space before creative exploration
+- Prevents premature fixation on holistic solutions
+- Ensures coverage across different aspects of the target concept
+
+**Factor 2: Expert Perspectives**
+- Different experts activate different semantic regions
+- Forces semantic jumps that LLMs wouldn't naturally make
+- Each expert provides a distinct input space for conceptual blending
+
+**Combined Effect (Interaction)**
+- Experts are more effective when given structured attributes to transform
+- Attributes without expert perspectives still generate predictable ideas
+- The combination creates systematic exploration of remote conceptual spaces
 
 ---
 
@@ -231,32 +262,43 @@ Output:
 
 ---
 
-## Testable Hypotheses
+## Testable Hypotheses (2×2 Factorial Design)
 
-### H1: Semantic Diversity
-> Multi-expert generation produces higher semantic diversity than single-expert or direct generation.
+Our experimental design manipulates two independent factors:
+1. **Attribute Decomposition**: With / Without
+2. **Expert Perspectives**: With / Without
 
+### H1: Main Effect of Attribute Decomposition
+> Conditions with attribute decomposition produce higher semantic diversity than those without.
+
+**Prediction**: (Attribute-Only + Full Pipeline) > (Direct + Expert-Only)
 **Measurement**: Mean pairwise cosine distance between idea embeddings
 
-### H2: Novelty
-> Ideas from multi-expert generation have lower patent overlap than direct generation.
+### H2: Main Effect of Expert Perspectives
+> Conditions with expert perspectives produce higher semantic diversity than those without.
 
-**Measurement**: Percentage of ideas with existing patent matches
+**Prediction**: (Expert-Only + Full Pipeline) > (Direct + Attribute-Only)
+**Measurement**: Mean pairwise cosine distance between idea embeddings
 
-### H3: Expert Count Effect
-> Semantic diversity increases with expert count, with diminishing returns beyond 4-6 experts.
+### H3: Interaction Effect
+> The combination of attributes and experts produces super-additive benefits.
 
-**Measurement**: Diversity vs. expert count curve
+**Prediction**: Full Pipeline > (Attribute-Only + Expert-Only - Direct)
+**Rationale**: Experts are more effective when given structured problem decomposition to work with.
+**Measurement**: Interaction term in 2×2 ANOVA
 
-### H4: Expert Source Effect
-> LLM-generated experts produce more unconventional ideas than curated/database experts.
+### H4: Novelty
+> The Full Pipeline produces ideas with lowest patent overlap.
 
-**Measurement**: Semantic distance from query centroid
+**Prediction**: Full Pipeline has highest novelty rate across all conditions
+**Measurement**: Percentage of ideas without existing patent matches
 
-### H5: Fixation Breaking
-> Multi-expert approach produces more ideas outside the top-3 semantic clusters than direct generation.
+### H5: Expert vs Random Control
+> Expert perspectives outperform random word perspectives.
 
-**Measurement**: Cluster distribution analysis
+**Prediction**: Expert-Only > Random-Perspective
+**Rationale**: Validates that domain knowledge (not just any perspective shift) drives improvement
+**Measurement**: Semantic diversity and human creativity ratings
 
 ---
 
@@ -271,10 +313,29 @@ Output:
 
 ## Positioning Against Related Work
 
+### Key Differentiator: Attribute Decomposition
+
+```
+PersonaFlow (2024):        Query → Experts → Ideas
+Our Approach:              Query → Attributes → (Attributes × Experts) → Ideas
+```
+
+**Why this matters**: Attribute decomposition provides **scaffolding** that makes expert perspectives more effective. An expert seeing "chair materials" generates more focused ideas than an expert seeing just "chair."
+
+### Comparison Table
+
 | Approach | Limitation | Our Advantage |
 |----------|------------|---------------|
-| Direct LLM generation | Semantic gravity, fixation | Expert-forced semantic jumps |
-| Human brainstorming | Cognitive fatigue, social dynamics | Tireless LLM generation |
-| PersonaFlow (2024) | Research-focused, no attribute structure | Product innovation, structured decomposition |
-| PopBlends (2023) | Two-concept blending only | Multi-expert, multi-attribute blending |
-| BILLY (2025) | Vector fusion less interpretable | Sequential generation, explicit control |
+| Direct LLM generation | Semantic gravity, fixation | Two-factor enhancement (attributes + experts) |
+| **PersonaFlow (2024)** | **No problem structure, experts see whole query** | **Attribute decomposition amplifies expert effect** |
+| PopBlends (2023) | Two-concept blending only | Systematic attribute × expert exploration |
+| BILLY (2025) | Cannot isolate what helps | 2×2 factorial design isolates contributions |
+| Persona prompting alone | Random coverage | Systematic coverage via attribute × expert matrix |
+
+### What We Can Answer That PersonaFlow Cannot
+
+1. **Does problem structure alone help?** (Attribute-Only vs Direct)
+2. **Do experts help beyond structure?** (Full Pipeline vs Attribute-Only)
+3. **Is there an interaction effect?** (Full Pipeline > Attribute-Only + Expert-Only - Direct)
+
+PersonaFlow showed experts help, but never tested whether **structuring the problem first** makes experts more effective.
diff --git a/start.sh b/start.sh
index ca2c28c..e26323b 100755
--- a/start.sh
+++ b/start.sh
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ source venv/bin/activate
 pip install -r requirements.txt -q
 
 # Start uvicorn in background
-uvicorn app.main:app --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000 &
+uvicorn app.main:app --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8001 &
 BACKEND_PID=$!
 echo "Backend PID: $BACKEND_PID"
 
@@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ echo -e "${GREEN}========================================${NC}"
 echo -e "${GREEN}Attribute Agent is running!${NC}"
 echo -e "${GREEN}========================================${NC}"
 echo ""
-echo -e "Backend:  ${YELLOW}http://localhost:8000${NC}"
+echo -e "Backend:  ${YELLOW}http://localhost:8001${NC}"
 echo -e "Frontend: ${YELLOW}http://localhost:5173${NC}"
-echo -e "API Docs: ${YELLOW}http://localhost:8000/docs${NC}"
+echo -e "API Docs: ${YELLOW}http://localhost:8001/docs${NC}"
 echo ""
 echo -e "Run ${YELLOW}./stop.sh${NC} to stop all services"